Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Why\s+send\s+5nn\s+\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ? (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:20:36 +0300
Why people send abbreviated 9 but 5 is not abbreviated? I am not Vulcan, but there is no logic. 73, Jukka OH6LI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00128.html (6,729 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ? (score: 1)
Author: <n1ix@n1ix.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:27:58 -0400
I dont think there is a cut number for 5. Otherwise, Im sure it would be used. I have a friend whos name is ANN she really has a difficult time being understood in contests where she has to send her
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00130.html (7,240 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark van Wijk, PA5MW" <pa5mw@home.nl>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:44:34 +0200
Oh yes there is: the '5' is currently replaced by 'E' where the RST exchange becomes effectively "ENN" I believe this is pushing it beyond the reasonable and I will not use it. Next the copiable 5NN
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00131.html (9,491 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ? (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 09:56:06 -0700
I've been sending enn for 599 for a long time. No one ever complained. 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00132.html (7,678 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ? (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:10:02 -0500
This is already being done. Five is a pretty quick on CW so most use it but there are few stations sending the cut number "E" instead. John KK9A To: n1ix@n1ix.com Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00133.html (7,984 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ? (score: 1)
Author: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 13:13:49 -0400
Some people send ENN. I hear ENN a few times in every CW contest. I don't think I've ever heard E for 5 in a serial number, however. I hope I never do. 73, Ken, AB1J In a message dated 2015-07-30 3:3
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00134.html (7,995 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ? (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:18:50 +0300
Why not remove a useless ENN, 5NN or 599 at all? RAEM contest has already realized this, adding a relatively complicated long/lat message instead. I do not "buy" the argument that 5NN is a "get ready
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00137.html (11,097 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ? (score: 1)
Author: Saulius Zalnerauskas <ly5w.sam@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 23:21:32 +0300
No no no, I like it, we need this. But in which form? ENN, SNN, 5NN, 599? Here is a question. Last IARU contest I liked SNN, some very smart contester did it. I will do this in EUHFC and WAEDC. Also
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00141.html (12,690 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 13:33:56 -0700
That doesn't mean we like it. Cut numbers beyond 5nn often slow things down, especially as part of an exchange. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00142.html (8,355 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ? (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:10:17 -0500
My preference is ENN, 5NN, or SNN in that order. They all easily and automagically convert to 599 at my fingertips. Beyond those, cut numbers in the RST are a distraction to me. In serial numbers, et
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00143.html (10,049 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:13:23 -0700
Agree. My rule is always allow someone to call me as soon as possible after I finish a QSO. I use N1MM. <F1> is TEST K9YC <F8> is CQ TEST K9YC <F9> is CQ TEST K9YC K9YC My end of QSO is TU K9YC If th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00145.html (9,506 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ? (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:18:36 +0700
I like "5NN and pse rpt ur call." I also still hear T6 signals. Ah, why not just send one dit ? Charly -- Charly, HS0ZCW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00147.html (11,170 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why send 5nn ? (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 06:52:28 +0300
Sam, You say: "No no no,I like it, we need this" (regarding ENN, SNN, 5NN or 599 A little bit further down, the same LY5W writes: "I hate (HATE) those callers who are using CQ TEST YA0YA YA0YA TEST"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-07/msg00152.html (16,701 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu