Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ZERO\s+points\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ZERO points (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:13:30 +0000 (GMT)
Your really think that ZERO points for own country applies EQUALLY to all contestants, like to VP9 and W/K/N, or JAs, or OMs etc? OK, let me 'splain again and once for all, what the "fascination" wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00566.html (15,058 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZERO points (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:32:12 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- At 0000 hours everyone's score may be equal but the competition is not. You are wanting to eliminate the zero pointers as a means of overcoming geographic disadv
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00571.html (8,731 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZERO points (score: 1)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:47:12 +0500
exploding with activity, because they >do not get deprived of working their next door contesters. I would argue with the above. Eu activity is on the rise as compaired to that of the US not only in C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00577.html (10,919 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZERO points (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:49:33 -0800
I can't believe how far this thread has gotten away from reality. You're bent over the key at midnight in your embattled hilltop radio shack, you emit a mad laugh, corona is flashing from the tips of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00581.html (8,729 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZERO points (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:27:59 +0000 (GMT)
Ok, I will give up! After I wrote explanation of desirability and reasons for removing zero point scoring bias, some don't get it and looks like they will never get it. You do not need handicap, we n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00591.html (10,903 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZERO points (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:53:24 +0000 (GMT)
In response to UA9CDC comments: We are talking here about CQ WW and its scoring system, if the US and other large countries were not penalized with zero points, there would be more activity, again WP
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00592.html (9,849 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZERO points (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 00:33:31 -0000
Promise? I get it! It's a DX contest. You get points for DX. You want points for USA stations, CU in SS or NAQP. Get it? 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00599.html (7,114 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZERO points (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 11:56:13 -0000
You are free to work them if you want. Just don't expect a very big score in cqww if you do. However, if you do that in ss or wpx or naqp or any of the myriad other contests where you get points for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00607.html (9,185 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu