Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+arrl\s+correction\s+factor\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: Rick Dougherty NQ4I <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:29:38 -0400
Here goes my take on how to fix ARRL..... assign points on the following formula 1000 miles = 1.0 points 2000 miles = 2.0 3000 miles =3.0 at so forth...so if W1 workd a DL1 and the distance is 2800 m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00268.html (7,706 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: Ken Claerbout <kclaerbo@bbg.gov>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:00:18 -0400
What about stuff worked long path?  Such as the 10 meter opening to Asia during ARRL DX SSB. K4ZW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00277.html (6,835 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:26:43 -0400
As Tom - W8JI has indicated, I don't see where such a scheme helps me much, and folks west of me - who have even a tougher time working Europe than I do - don't get much help either. Spend a few minu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00279.html (10,037 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:08:32 EDT
You are closing in on a good idea on how to score DX contests, though I'd prefer to whittle the spread down to about a 3:1 ratio. Unfortunately you are talking about the wrong DX contest. Distance sc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00282.html (8,557 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:58:06 -0300
Kind of a selfish point of view. We down here do not complain about having a small time window to work USA on 160M , most probably just a couple of hours right before our sunrise most of the time. Bu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00291.html (12,863 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:01:40 -0400
Disclaimer, this is not what I usually work with so I am open to corrections by those more experienced. Martin, Distance, without things like path problems, is by the inverse of the square of distanc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00003.html (10,721 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: "Michael D. Adams" <mda@ab1od.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:25:48 -0400
luck, it Of course, if you want to get at the "you win some, you lose some, and hopefully it all evens out" element...perhaps the answer to perceived unfairness in certain contests' scoring is to hav
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00008.html (8,426 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: Andrew AC6WI <ac6wi@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:21:30 -0400
Most of the arguments so far seem to be based on a perceived inequality between the W1 and W4 call areas. Changing the scoring system for everyone in order to try to equalise these two areas would do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00010.html (11,072 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: Luc PY8AZT <py8azt@dxbrasil.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 08:20:49 -0300
Martin, If this change will implemented on ARRL, we really do know, but If It would every contester might be hazarded. Life would change, and changes panic everyone. So, it's acceptable everyone is t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00014.html (14,280 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:43:29 -0300
Excellent analysis Tom and I understand the situation in the US. On a world wide basis it's pretty different in most cases. Taking the ARRL DX test as an example. Consider a station here in LU, enter
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00018.html (14,394 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: MikeTheActuary <miketheactuary@ab1od.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 05:38:29 -0400
luck, it Of course, if you want to get at the "you win some, you lose some, and hopefully it all evens out" element...perhaps the answer to perceived unfairness in certain contests' scoring is to hav
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00038.html (8,919 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 16:54:34 -0300
I agree Tony. The same thing happens to us when we hear Caribbean Stations on 160 and 80 running at 200+Qs/hr and I guess not even in our dreams we can achieve that :-) Anyway, this thread has been r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00092.html (18,874 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:02:10 -0400
As W8JI and others pointed out there are many factors involved besides distance. In some cases such as 10M, particularly with present band conditions those closer to the US may be at a disadvantage.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00093.html (16,405 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 18:59:34 -0400
Hi Martin I also found this thread quite interesting, but I would add this: Can we come up with a very complex scoring system that takes into account propagation, time of the year, historical norms,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00096.html (12,639 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl correction factor (score: 1)
Author: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:05:37 -0300
Howdy Tom. An algorithm to level distance and path conditions certainly has nothing to do with the effort each individual spends in building his/her own station or the qualities/skills of the operato
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00097.html (15,114 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu