Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+arrl\s+dx\s+cw\s+spotting\s+report\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] arrl dx cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:31:20 +0000
"Only" 36557 spots this weekend. Lack of 10m and 15m obviously slowed down the daytime spotting. The top spotting rate on Saturday didn't break 1000/hr, but did make it up to almost 1200/hr in the 15
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00372.html (16,340 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] arrl dx cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:44:19 +0000
A big weekend for cw spots. 45572 spots in the database this time. The most spotted DX stations: DX Count K5D 2325 6Y1LZ 338 PJ2T 334 CT9L 274 W3LPL 223 D4C 210 YN2DD 210 ZY7C 204 9A1A 203 TM6M 201 T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00386.html (15,380 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] arrl dx cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:14:58 +0000
There were 44489 spots in my database from this weekend. This database from the cluster and the excel spreadsheet of the dxsummit spots will be available about the same time as this report at http://
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00330.html (19,032 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Fabian Kurz <mail@fkurz.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:04:46 +0100
This has a log tradition. LZ3ND spots some juicy DX (usually known calls with one letter wrong) on his own frequency and hopes for people to click on the spot and work him. While this is intolerable
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00345.html (8,121 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:16:21 -0700
I wonder how productive that really is, as: 1. Many stations would log the ZD8, not bothering to listen for an ID. Was the LZ smart enough to ID with every QSO? and 2. It will generate many dupes. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00366.html (9,503 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Lynch" <director@allianceparty.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:15:04 -0800
bad. We had finally managed to scare up a mini JA run on 160 from G6PZ around their sunrise time in the last few hours of WWCW last year, and were particularly hoping that maybe a few other Far East
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00370.html (8,143 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:51:03 -0800
This might be a reason as to why self spotting might be a better way to go. Only allow self spots once per hour or once per band change; whatever. I'm sure the software can be configured to reject an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00377.html (10,048 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: somata90924@mypacks.net
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:52:42 -0500 (EST)
it is not right zf2ah --Original Message-- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00074.html (8,458 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Neiger" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:20:17 -0800
Oh the Wonderful World of Packet (WWOP) For those who champion its existence, be careful for what you ask........... How sad that our beloved past-time has been relegated to this nonsense: (1) someon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00082.html (11,065 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 23:47:05 +0100
N6TJ wrote: Our hobby is truly much less than it once was because of packet. G3SXW data on contest participation even in the lean years of sunspots does NOT support your thesys. There is significant
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00083.html (7,738 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:42:08 -0600
Isn't blaming Packet Cluster for the problems with DXing & contesting like blaming the Bank of America for armed robbery? -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View, TN EM66 ___________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00084.html (7,578 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu