Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+band\s+plan\s+definition\s+\-\s+LSB\s+vs\s+USB\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <tonno.vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 16:22:23 +0300
There is one thing has been bothering me for a while and I am sure there are some knowledgable people here who can explain this. * - Lowest dial setting for LSB Voice mode: 1843, 3603 and 7053 kHz* B
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00040.html (7,845 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Richard DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:25:48 -0400
* - Lowest dial setting for LSB Voice mode: 1843, 3603 and 7053 kHz* But it does not mention the highest dial setting for USB on 20-10 meters. So is it allowed to work USB on 14349 what concerns the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00042.html (9,160 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 12:35:52 -0500 (CDT)
If your SSB signal is 3 kHz wide... And the top of 20 meters is 14.350 MHz... And you don't want any of your signal to be transmitted above the top of the band... Then your highest dial setting on a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00044.html (9,156 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 15:47:41 -0500
Suppressed carrier (dial frequency) should be at least 3kHz away from the SSB band edge. On 20m USB that would be 14.347 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy and his radio" -- Proud Member of: A1 Operato
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00046.html (10,568 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 12:18:58 -0600
The following applies to amateur radio operators in the United States, quoted directly from the FCC regulations: 97.307(b) Emissions resulting from modulation must be confined to the band or segment
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00047.html (11,455 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:41:07 -0500
The US regulations require our signals to be contained within the designated band limits. As an example, 14.150 ~ 14.350 MHz. A transceiver typically displays the suppressed carrier frequency. Let's
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00048.html (10,254 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:59:55 -0400
Suppressed carrier (dial frequency) should be at least 3kHz away from the SSB band edge. On 20m USB that would be 14.347>> The highest frequency in an ideal transmitter is the highest audio tone pass
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00050.html (9,150 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 16:03:55 -0400
In SSB modes, an amateur transceiver's dial reading is the suppressed carrier frequency, not the actual transmitted frequencies. If your radio's dial is on 14349 USB and you speak into the microphone
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00051.html (9,797 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 14:24:02 -0600
Corrected to 14247 to 14347. No need to make 20 meters any smaller than it already is ! -- The following applies to amateur radio operators in the United States, quoted directly from the FCC regulati
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00053.html (11,641 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 16:56:33 -0400
Just some comments. Regarding the LSB (and LSB was specifically mentioned) limit, if some signal gets out below the phone band limit, it is still in a ham band and does not interfere with other servi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00055.html (8,980 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 19:40:44 -0400
Just some comments. Regarding the LSB (and LSB was specifically mentioned) limit, if some signal gets out below the phone band limit, it is still in a ham band and does not interfere with other servi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00058.html (9,476 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 21:04:17 -0400
- If my station is operating on USB, with a typical 3 dB transmit bandwidth of 2.7 kHz, then virtually all of the power of my fundamental emission is above my suppressed carrier frequency, and extend
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00059.html (9,415 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:38:32 -0400
Tom: You are absolutely correct, and I was not suggesting its OK to operate with emissions outside the phone band. I was just trying to address Tõnno's question as to why the ITU R1 band plan specifi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00066.html (9,951 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 10:20:01 -0600
No. What do you mean, "No" ? Go back and reread what I said. Especially the part "at least 2.7 kHz above my suppressed carrier frequency". Your explanation completely validates what I said. You also
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00068.html (10,370 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <tonno.vahk@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 22:34:10 +0300
What a nice and overwhelming response to my question and all is clear now. Thank you guys. I just did not know the term supressed carrier. Thus the definition clearly stresses that no part of the sig
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00069.html (11,235 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 16:35:10 -0400
Go back and reread what I said. Especially the part "at least 2.7 kHz above my suppressed carrier frequency". Your explanation completely validates what I said. You also conveniently edited-out my la
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00071.html (9,593 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:35:29 -0600
If your SSB signal is 3 kHz wide... And the top of 20 meters is 14.350 MHz... And you don't want any of your signal to be transmitted above the top of the band... Then your highest dial setting on a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00099.html (8,317 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:18:10 -0700
For United States amateurs, this is a legal, not a band plan issue. Operating USB on 14151 does not violate the FCC rules. Operating USB on 14348 does violate the FCC rules. The CQWW rules do not spe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00100.html (9,869 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: w5ov@w5ov.com
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:25:29 -0500
Unless you switched to LSB when you went to 14150, your receiver was receiving for a ~3 kHz bandwidth above the frequency on your dial. So, when you're on 14149 (for example) your ~3 KHz receiver ban
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00102.html (9,530 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:03:09 -0600
It is not that they are transmitting below 14.150, it's that you're listening above 14.150. Of course! Excellent point! And I guess perhaps there was a bit of splatter too from a couple of big statio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00104.html (8,318 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu