Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+callsign\s+advantages\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+callsign\s+advantages\s*$/: 49 ]

Total 49 documents matching your query.

41. [CQ-Contest] Callsign Advantages (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Wed Mar 12 17:48:38 2003; I miss Trey's old call. And for personal reasons... it's his fault I got this call back (I'd read in a QST Stray of some of the old Novice calls being re-assigned after the prefix change, his amongst; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00150.html (12,289 bytes)
42. [CQ-Contest] Callsign Advantages (score: 1): Author: VY2MGY@sympatico.ca (Brian Campbell); Date: Wed Mar 12 19:11:25 2003; Well heres my take on the subject AKA .02 worth... I got my call VY2MGY/3 [ /3 as I am in Ve3 land ] in 1998 especially for contesting and I am the first to agree with everyone that it is 1. a mouthf; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00152.html (8,948 bytes)
43. [CQ-Contest] Callsign Advantages (score: 1): Author: k8cc@comcast.net (David A. Pruett); Date: Thu Mar 13 16:52:29 2003; I for one wish Brian would get a correct callsign, because acccording to every accepted portable callsign convention I've ever seen, his call should be interpreted as a VY3, of which there is no such; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00171.html (11,549 bytes)
44. [CQ-Contest] Callsign Advantages (score: 1): Author: MTessmer@axxesstech.com (Mike Tessmer); Date: Thu Mar 13 17:27:53 2003; For 17 years I was N0BSH....a call which violated almost all the "rules." But I operated a lot and people recognized the call. I guess you hear 10 dits in a row and you just assume...... In light of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00172.html (8,220 bytes)
45. [CQ-Contest] Callsign Advantages (score: 1): Author: ve3kz@netcom.ca (Bob, VE3KZ); Date: Thu Mar 13 19:49:52 2003; Gee Mike, I used to belong to that club as VE3BHS, with another 6 dits. During the summer QRN most of my call was invisible! Never did any serious LF work until I changed my call in 1969. Now my only; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00173.html (9,461 bytes)
46. [CQ-Contest] Callsign Advantages (score: 1): Author: roberto.soro@sia.it (Soro Roberto); Date: Wed Mar 19 19:21:17 2003; My 2 eurocent(hi). There are callsign that wprk better and other not, well its true, but the key is to be present, or stay in the chair and operate: during last RDXC, in a noisy 20M band, beaming US; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00218.html (10,000 bytes)
47. [CQ-Contest] Callsign Advantages (score: 1): Author: aluscre@neo.rr.com (Anthony Luscre K8ZT); Date: Sat Mar 22 00:22:05 2003; Funny Gary,I often have that same problem -- Anthony A. Luscre K8ZT Stow, Ohio Visit My Website at http://www.qsl.net/k8zt; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00248.html (8,984 bytes)
48. [CQ-Contest] Callsign Advantages (score: 1): Author: VY2MGY@sympatico.ca (Brian Campbell); Date: Fri Mar 28 21:22:34 2003; Hello one and all After some good advice and welcome comments a couple of weeks ago here on the reflector I decided to get a new callsign that would reflect where I am residing and make the log check; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00269.html (8,780 bytes)
49. [CQ-Contest] Callsign Advantages (score: 1): Author: aa7bg@3rivers.net (Matt); Date: Sun Mar 30 10:45:24 2003; My first vanity choice (wow almost 7 years ago now) was N7NN. Somebody beat me to it. I don't think there is a more rhythmic call out there. -Even though K7BG (ex-AA7BG) ends with a dit, I rarely get; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00275.html (7,625 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 49
Page: [1] [2] [3]