Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+callsigns\s+for\s+wrtc\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+callsigns\s+for\s+wrtc\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] callsigns for wrtc (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 22:46:02 -0400; Does anyone know which of the 52 callsigns will NOT be used for the event? They have PW5A-Z and PT5A-Z but only 47 stations. Be nice to know which ones to look for so we know if we worked them all...; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00059.html (6,717 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] callsigns for wrtc (score: 1): Author: w8hc@aol.com; Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 13:08:20 -0400; It looks like they didn't want to handicap anyone with the "S" or "H" suffix. That just wouldn't work too well on CW following the "5." Looks like maybe the PT5Z was dropped too. Hal, W8HC --Original; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00062.html (7,850 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] callsigns for wrtc (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 10 Jul 2006 09:07:37 -0500; W1AW/4 worked all PT5 and PW5 suffixes *except*: PT5H PT5S PT5Z PW5H PW5R PW5S Hard to believe we would have missed one that was on, as all the ones we did work we worked on multiple bands. Not sure; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00074.html (7,878 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] callsigns for wrtc (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:08:35 -0400; several seemed to be equal strenght, BUT PT5K blew everyones doors off on 40m, at least from what I could hear, and at the same time, also on 40m, PT5O and PT5E were so weak, they were just above th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00081.html (8,018 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] callsigns for wrtc (score: 1): Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:58:41 -0400; Doug, et al: NU1AW/8 missed four of those same calls. We also missed PW5E, however, we show PT5Z in the log on 40 CW. Dave/K8CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00082.html (8,149 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] callsigns for wrtc (score: 1): Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:25:44 +0200; I worked 46 teams, as far as I understand that should be all, same calls are also missing for me. 73 Jim SM2EKM -- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00087.html (8,350 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] callsigns for wrtc (score: 1): Author: "Craig Cook" <craig.n7or@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 06:18:10 -0700; Ok. I missed it. That's what I thought. -- 73, Craig Cook - N7OR in Sandy, OR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00095.html (9,407 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]