Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+code\s+readers\s+vs\.\s+fill\s+ins\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+code\s+readers\s+vs\.\s+fill\s+ins\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] code readers vs. fill ins (score: 1): Author: BRYON PAUL n0ah VEAL <bryonveal@msn.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:48:25 -0600; I feel contest software with call sign/name/bloodtype/exchange information fill ins are much more of a blight on creating an "assisted" non-assisted contester then any code readers/skimmers ever will; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00350.html (7,014 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] code readers vs. fill ins (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:35:00 +0200; Paul, I share your feelings. Callsigns database was the greatest tool at our 2002 K1B DX-ped. No CW Skimmers to display all the callers. People enjoy debating nuisances of their mother tongue @ KR2Q.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00352.html (7,105 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]