Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+contest\s+activity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+contest\s+activity\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] contest activity (score: 1): Author: stoskopf@tri.net; Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:01:54 -0600 (CST); An interesting approach would be to look at the number of individual stations that the "big boys" worked or data from the dup lists to see how many got on for a few contacts and didn't really contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00124.html (6,993 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] contest activity (score: 1): Author: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 23:58:56 +0100; stoskopf@tri.net schrieb: Isn´t that the most important question: "Why don´t they really contest?" If they did the overall number of QSOs during a specific contest would raise - and that; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00126.html (8,498 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] contest activity (score: 1): Author: mike dormal dormann <w7dra@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 18:56:14 -0800; but then there are some of us who have only single band set ups. it takes me about 5 minutes to go from the 160m cabin to the 40m cabin, and setting up to work two bands in the same contest is practi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00128.html (7,384 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]