Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+contest\s+restructing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+contest\s+restructing\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] contest restructing (score: 1): Author: Larry via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 17:21:45 -0400; hi guys, i have read quite a few ideas about restructuring the CQ WW. obviously there is a need to modernise this contest. preserving old scores is a foolish reason. present radios have -40 db compar; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00156.html (7,767 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] contest restructing (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:32:48 -0700; The way the DX contests are now is kind of like having 10 participants in a 100 yard dash and 4 of them have 2 legs and the rest have only 1. But - they all run in the same race. I'm sure the 2-legge; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00157.html (10,336 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] contest restructing (score: 1): Author: Chris Plumblee <chris.plumblee@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 19:16:35 -0400; CQWW SSB, at least, is not impossible for stations west of the Mississippi to win. N5AU won M/M in the 1980's, and N2IC won SOABHP in 2013. I take no position on whether the rules of CQWW should be c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00158.html (9,851 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] contest restructing (score: 1): Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 02:07:59 +0000; Going back to 1948, only one station outside of W1/2/3/4 has ever won USA CW. CW Year Call Category Score QSOs Zn Cty Hours Operator(s) 2015 N5DX/2 SO HP ALL 9,961,955 5,097 159 526 48.0 @N2QV 2014 K; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00161.html (14,362 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] contest restructing (score: 1): Author: Chris Plumblee <chris.plumblee@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 22:38:24 -0400; At the risk of being contrarian for its own sake, I wonder what's different about CQWW SSB, because there have been (relatively speaking) lots of winners from outside of the east coast in that contes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00163.html (16,117 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] contest restructing (score: 1): Author: Prasad VU2PTT <vu2ptt@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 08:29:18 +0530; Is it because on CW the East Coast can pick up a lot of 3rd, 4th and 5th layer stations from EU which may not that easy on SSB? 73 de Prasad VU2PTT Sent from my iPhone _______________________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00165.html (18,297 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] contest restructing (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:41:13 -0700; AI6V K6AHV K7RI N2IC/5 N7DD W6RR (3x) W7RM WM5G Have won CQWW SSB. That's a span of 45 years. WM5G is in TX, N2IC is at high elevation in NM, neither are anywhere near the west coast. :) Also, in the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00168.html (9,160 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] contest restructing (score: 1): Author: Bill via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 04:58:40 +0000 (UTC); To VE9CB: I'm not sure of the relevance of your post. If I was a VE9 with no listed QTH on QRZ.com, in the CQWWSSB I would just sit on 21.195, 14.145 and 7.080 and have a good ole time running EU wit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00169.html (9,115 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] contest restructing (score: 1): Author: Katsuhiro Kondou <kondou@voyackey.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:32:42 +0900 (JST); It also applies to JA. For eastern Japan, it's quite difficult to win, and there's much more possibilities to win in western Japan. I cannot expect to work so many USA than what was over twenty years; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00170.html (8,955 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] Contest restructing (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Isar" <aisar@millerisar.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:48:54 -0700; "Since 1970"... Winning from zone 3 was possible even through the 1980s because of the high number of Asian - Japanese - stations. Now long since gone! And the increasing number of BYs do not make up; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00188.html (8,648 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]