Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+cqww\s+rtty\s+dxsummit\s+spot\s+report\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+cqww\s+rtty\s+dxsummit\s+spot\s+report\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] cqww rtty dxsummit spot report (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 21:47:27 -0000; I'm sorry, this will probably be ugly to read, but I don't have a lot of time right now to make it pretty. This is from the ip address data available from dxsummit. I did a simple sort by ip address; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00010.html (22,427 bytes)
2. RE: [CQ-Contest] cqww rtty dxsummit spot report (score: 1): Author: "Hans K0HB" <K-Zero-HB@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 04:05:01 +0100; Yes, it's ugly, David. But it's not ugly because you didn't have a lot of time; it's ugly because you took the time to toss out in a public forum a lot unproven innuendo and snide comments, and then; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00014.html (8,409 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww rtty dxsummit spot report (score: 1): Author: "Timo Klimoff" <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 11:42:26 +0300; But de facto is that those spots shown were put from the listed ip-number. Eg. several US stations spoting from same ip which is allocated to the country of spotted DX-station, coincidence? Of cours; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00016.html (8,422 bytes)
4. RE: [CQ-Contest] cqww rtty dxsummit spot report (score: 1): Author: "Cooper, Stewart" <coopers@odl.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 12:42:32 +0100; These are not "thinly veiled allegations", but facts. The "unproven innuendo" is also already in the public domain. David is just the messenger. Stewart GM4AFF/GM0F Yes, it's ugly, David. But it's no; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00019.html (9,459 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww rtty dxsummit spot report (score: 1): Author: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>; Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 14:07:11 -0600; But de facto is that those spots shown were put from the listed ip-number. Eg. several US stations spoting from same ip which is allocated to the country of spotted DX-station, coincidence? It's impo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00034.html (9,310 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]