Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+cut\s+\#\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+cut\s+\#\'s\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut #'s (score: 1): Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:44:33 +0000; The slow-responders that I've noticed have definitely NOT been using computer-generated CW; they were sending by hand. That being the case....... May I suggest that perhaps, those who can copy faster; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00117.html (8,309 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut #'s (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:02:32 -0700; Hi Shelby You are right on there. I think sometimes op's have their CW (computer) speed set real slow even if they can copy much faster. I have never figured out why in the heck if I am sending at 35; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00114.html (8,928 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut #'s (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 05:18:55 -0400; Steve Harrison wrote: "SLOW DOWN to the speed at which they call you (unless you absolutely KNOW the other op can copy at your hyper-speed). That's mere courtesy but can also save you having to repea; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00098.html (7,316 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut #'s (score: 1): Author: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 23:45:20 -0700; Hey, Guys: No apology necessary, John, 'cuz your spot-on. I feel your pain. And everyone said: "AMEN!!!" Thank You. 73... Rick, K6VVA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00097.html (7,686 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut #'s (score: 1): Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:26:16 +0000; ...... and SLOW DOWN to the speed at which they call you (unless you absolutely KNOW the other op can copy at your hyper-speed). That's mere courtesy but can also save you having to repeat your excha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00092.html (7,377 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut #'s (score: 1): Author: K5NZ@aol.com; Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 06:22:45 EDT; <<While we are on cut numbers, I'd (again) like to plead for hams to stop sending "J" for "1." That is fairly common among second tier European contesters. Some even have their computers set to send; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00076.html (7,535 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]