- 1. [CQ-Contest] cut numbers and QRP (score: 1)
- Author: kr2q@optonline.net
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:47:06 +0000 (GMT)
- [snip] Excuse me Dick....but part of your quote is wrong. 2.1.3.1.QRP: 5-W PEP output or less. PLEASE do not call QRP 10 watts or less. As for cut numbers, NN = 99 just like 5NN = 599. Did anyone ev
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00361.html (7,231 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut numbers and QRP (score: 1)
- Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:04:12 -0500
- And the station this past weekend sending "5NN NNN" felt it meant "599 999" for the standard signal report and 999 watts. 73 Hank K8DD -- 'Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00398.html (8,597 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut numbers and QRP (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Harrisonusa" <k0xp@dandy.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:21:10 -0500 (EST)
- ........ And I rember working dozens of those, all the way back into the early '70s. What's so unusual bout it??????? "N" has LONG been known to represent "9" when used in a signal report or contest
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00417.html (8,050 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut numbers and QRP (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:37:09 -0500
- I had no trouble with them but I'd still like to see a convention established where individuals can't make up their own or use them where they like. I just like clarity. 73 -- Paul VO1HE ____________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00434.html (9,663 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu