Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+dit\s+dit\s+dit\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+dit\s+dit\s+dit\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 23:01:55 -0600; I have contest logs from the '60s where RST was sent as a variable, a real world guesstimate about the strength of the station you were working. This was 'pre computer' days. Later, with the introduc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00000.html (7,406 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>; Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 06:09:50 -0800; Bob, I got one better- how about EEEE for a report? Why do you bother with zone 4 when the argument is that the robot determines your zone anyway? 73, Albert I have contest logs from the '60s where R; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00008.html (8,663 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 08:20:52 -0500; Why not "extend" dit dit dit dit to five dits instead of four, then reapply cut number (tm). Super efficient - just a single dit!! Should be super fast, confusion be damned... Tom - VE3CX ___________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00011.html (8,837 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:02:51 -0500 (EST); That's dit dit dit dit. Better slow it down a little: >>EEEE<< I wouldn't want to copy it wrong and get dinged. 73, Kermit, AB1J In a message dated 12/1/2011 11:37:22 A.M. GMT Standard Time, k0rc@cit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00015.html (7,478 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:15:57 -0800; How about for the CQWW: Me: Test de W7WHY You: XX9XXX Me: XX9XXX tu QRZ They don't check zone or RST anyway. 73 Tom W7WHY Why not "extend" dit dit dit dit to five dits instead of four, then reapply c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00029.html (7,955 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:36:13 -0500; I can't wait to hear EE5E send EEEE. -- Mike DeChristopher, N1TA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00040.html (8,405 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 08:18:57 -0600; I was waiting for someone to take this to it's logical conclusion. But it isn't happening. Why send the signal report at all? The logging programs already default to 59/599. At the minimal since cut; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00044.html (7,280 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:33:32 -0700; And we could... just send our call... no exchange.. because... the logging defaults anyway.. and all we would have to do is type in the call of the station heard... actually.... well.. ok.. type in t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00050.html (8,742 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: Glenn Wyant <va3dx@sympatico.ca>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 14:53:05 -0500; I wonder if you sent in a log ? After all the rules state a signal report is part of the exchange ... Glenn VA3DX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00053.html (8,026 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 13:33:07 -0600; ....horrors!!! Nay, horror of horrors!!!!! You sent no signal report???? The sponsor DEMANDS in his rules that you send a signal report! Of course this same sponsor then lets it be known that accurat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00054.html (7,582 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 15:53:32 -0600; And what about all the stations that logged the signal report less contact with me? Are they going to loose points ... I don't think so. That rule is obviously not applied. So why are so many hell be; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00064.html (8,863 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 17:41:37 -0600; You haven't been paying attention, Paul. There is no need to copy callsigns. Just point and click. CQWW is no longer a contest which requires a radioman in attendance. We need a new category -- "Assi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00065.html (8,689 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 08:49:59 -0700; aaaa... now, by golly, we are getting somewhere... no operator... and no radio... really! just a cd... with all the call signs in the world... copy and paste... drag and drop... hit the submit button; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00073.html (10,650 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 14:26:41 -0600; When is a rule not a rule? When it has become the unspoken rule or common sense rule, that it is OK not to send a signal report and still not lose the contact points. Doug signal ____________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00075.html (8,394 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 10:52:22 -0500; So, is the point of this thread to get organizers to cross check the signal report? If so, this is the only sport on the face of the earth where competitors encourage the governing body to add more r; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00085.html (9,588 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 13:20:00 -0600; Why hand out ANY report when I don't lose any contest points by not handing out a signal report. Some just don't get it. You don't need to send a signal report to get the points. So why mindlessly do; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00086.html (9,210 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 12:15:35 -0700; Actually Mike, the point of this thread, is that there are so many whiners and so much whine.. that there is no more cheese or crackers.. and I am just plain tired of it. First it is the exchange is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00087.html (10,973 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:31:47 -0500; Hi Doug... Because the rules tell you to. The rules are available and online. Because the rules tell you to. The rules are available and online. There's a speed limit on my road. A police officer is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00088.html (9,357 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 13:21:25 -0600; Checking the exchange wouldn't be adding a new rule. The rules already require the exchange of the report. Good contestants in any sport would expect that higher skills would be rewarded over lesser; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00089.html (9,702 bytes)
20. Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:16:30 -0600; Let me give you an example of a real rule pertaining to speed limits since you referenced it. The posted speed limit here on some highways is 100 kmph. That is the posted rule. Now if I get clocked a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00090.html (10,381 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]