Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+encourgaing\s+more\s+entrants\s+in\s+CQWW\s+\(was\s+CHECK\s+LOGS\)\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:07:31 +0000 (GMT)
It is great to see interest in creating more entrants in the CQWW contests... THANKS for the input! Just as an FYI, here is some data for 2011 SSB (so far). These are e-logs, which means that paper l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00378.html (8,033 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:18:10 -0500
Hi Doug, Any chance you have historical data on this? Might be interesting to see if there is a trend. Are operators operating less of the contest now than they were, say, ten years ago? Twenty? Just
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00379.html (9,488 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: Jack/W6NF <vhfplus@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:27:10 -0800
With an aging contest participant population I would feel that less time in the chair is probable... Not the iron men we...no, I'll exclude myself...they once were. -- Jack, W6NF Silver Springs, NV D
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00380.html (7,986 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: Jack Haverty <jack@3kitty.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:22:01 -0800
Interesting data. I wonder what it would look like for the whole data set including people who don't submit logs. I suspect it would be even more skewed toward smaller hours. Actually, I think there'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00383.html (12,144 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:16:19 -0600
You may find this article "The 24 Hour Dx Challenge" and the accompany survey on contesting.com http://www.contesting.com/articles/401 This approach has support. All it requires is a group to organi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00384.html (8,350 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 06:48:46 -0800
I believe there is a place for time limited categories in contesting. It would increase participation and activity among some people if they had an outlet for their competitive spirit even though the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00393.html (15,058 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: "Christian Schneider" <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 16:43:17 +0100
However, there is a very real danger of unintended consequences. Whatever time limit is set, there will be some people who operate more to maximize their time under the limit. There will be other peo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00394.html (10,727 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:47:30 -0600
Absolutely - whenever a competitive category is created, expect the competitors to enter it. Randy is spot on about consequences which are likely enough for a sponsor to avoid them. Proceed with cau
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00403.html (9,182 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: Mike N1TA <n1tangoalpha@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:36:13 -0500
Well, the goal here is not to create a noncompetitive category. It would simply be to give operators a chance to be competitive in a shorter category. So yes, you are correct. The real competitors wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00404.html (11,815 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:30:46 -0600
Randy said: "If we had a time limited category, it would tend to drive activity to the already high activity periods. It would tend to discourage activity in the slow times. Not helpful." Wouldn't a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00405.html (18,174 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: "Jack Haverty." <k3fiv@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:33:31 -0800
It's very wise to be cautious. What I'm suggesting as a starting experiment is not to change a contest at all. Instead, contest organizers (more accurately those who publicize the results) can be mor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00410.html (12,695 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: Jack Haverty <jack@3kitty.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:08:26 -0800
Syl - thanks, very interesting survey and comments! Thanks for the pointer. I think that survey data and comments, although valid, probably don't reflect the views or predict the behavior of all thos
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00411.html (10,124 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:37:15 -0700
If there were a limited category and many or most of the current full-time ops cut back, that tells you something right there - that the 48h category has outlived its usefulness as the contest commun
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00412.html (17,605 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 18:55:03 -0500
Any time that there is a rule change, or a category addition or deletion, or a rescheduling, there will be -- always! -- unintended consequences. That should not be, in and of itself, a reason to avo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00414.html (12,401 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] encourgaing more entrants in CQWW (was CHECK LOGS) (score: 1)
Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 23:21:58 -0400
In contests with public logs, the entire data set is right there for the analyzing. There are parsers and analyzers (CBS.exe, for example) that find all sorts of metrics in a Cabrillo-formatted log
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00416.html (9,162 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu