Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ft1kd\s+vs\s+ft1kmp\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] ft1kd vs ft1kmp (score: 1)

Author: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>

Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:36:26 -0400

I follow the Reflector on the Web, so VE4XT's posting came right after the long (and interesting) discussion of the PT5M vs PW5C scores. Hence, my first thought about Kelly's subject was: "Well, 'kd

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00300.html (7,065 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ft1kd vs ft1kmp (score: 1)

Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>

Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 03:44:26 -0700

Yes it does. See W8JI's webpage for the fix. It's fairly straigthforward. Me too. 73, Mike W4EF............................... _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00298.html (7,288 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] ft1kd vs ft1kmp (score: 1)

Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>

Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 21:20:58 -0500

Hi all, I see that the Ft1000d is now, on average, a couple hun more than a used FT1kMP. Just out of curiosity, what does the collective wisdom say about the differences between rigs for contesting.

/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-08/msg00296.html (6,846 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]