Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+inequities\s+in\s+contesting\s+and\s+a\s+proposal\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+inequities\s+in\s+contesting\s+and\s+a\s+proposal\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] inequities in contesting and a proposal (score: 1): Author: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 09:31:21 -0500; I see a lot of comments from stations complaining about a USA-EU cabal that limits the fun for others in CQWW. I would submit that the level of fun (or perceived lack thereof) is belied by the fact t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00085.html (11,529 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] inequities in contesting and a proposal (score: 1): Author: brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:09:52 +0000 (GMT); An interesting and novel concept Richard which could certainly be a lot of fun, I would love to try it. The hard part would be probably to find an empty weekend and I don't know if the logging progr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00094.html (12,166 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] inequities in contesting and a proposal (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:36:49 +0000; This idea brings two thoughts to mind. First, is the obvious reaction: the contest calendar is plenty full as it is. We probably don't need to antagonize anti-contesters any further by cramming anoth; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00095.html (9,691 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]