- 1. [CQ-Contest] long callsigns (score: 1)
- Author: Derrick Belbas <ve4vv@shaw.ca>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:45:00 -0500
- VE7VEDAY was recently active, and still might be, for all I know. When Kelly and I did the Minnesota QSO party, we briefly considered using W0/J79VV/m/(3 letter county name), but we elected to not do
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00169.html (7,142 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] long callsigns (score: 1)
- Author: "Mark Steven Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 02:06:25 +0100
- You didn't specify CW or SSB? On fone, how about something like KB9XYZ/AG portable KG4. On CW, KF6JXP/AE/WP4...or KF6PFQ/QRP/VY1.... That's about as obnoxious as I can conjure. Next..... K9GX -- Orig
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00176.html (8,395 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] long callsigns (score: 1)
- Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:49:51 EDT
- Somebody somewhere can make a callsign as long as they like, like HA800IARU or TG0FRACAP. There's no limit. With stock calls I'd think the limit would be a 2x3 portable in a 2x1 prefix county, like V
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00182.html (7,367 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] long callsigns (score: 1)
- Author: "k7qq" <k7qq@netzero.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:21:18 -0000
- (( the / AG )) could be required but the (( QRP )) is a bunch of Quack using lengthy for _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00212.html (9,852 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu