Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+making\s+lemonade\s+$was\:\s+ARRL\s+report\s+on\s+linescores\s+decision$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+making\s+lemonade\s+$was\:\s+ARRL\s+report\s+on\s+linescores\s+decision$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on linescores decision) (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Fri Jul 26 08:19:33 2002; I wouldn't mind 15 days either, but I can't, for the life of me, figure out why that should improve timeliness of result delivery by more than 15 days. Put another way, all of what Trey proposes coul; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00443.html (9,127 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] making lemonade (was: ARRL report on linescores decision) (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Fri Jul 26 12:07:13 2002; Mark, my point was that all of those things could be (are) happening regardless of whether the log deadline is 15 or 30 days, so the net improvement from that single change is only 15 days. I just th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00452.html (9,345 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]