Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+multi\-contesting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+multi\-contesting\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: Dick Frey - K4XU <k4xu@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:18:58 -0700; I tried to play in all three state QP's but was frustrated by VA's requirement for a SN. I got N1MM to accept all the different county exchanges by modifying the QSOParty.sec file. But when I worked; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00421.html (7,175 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 07:25:58 -0400; I was going to start a thread on this topic as well though I was going to start in the N1MM group. This weekend there are 5 contests I participated in. Maybe not "normal" for a diehard contester, but; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00422.html (9,146 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:14:47 -0700 (PDT); This is a topic of interest here as well... One needs to be pretty agile to swap contests, even more so if the exchanges vary. This is the one major challenge for the MARAC/7QP/NEQP/InQP/ARI weekend.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00447.html (12,113 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:16:50 -0700 (PDT); Now if we could have standard County abbreviations so we can play in MARAC this weekend as well, with little difficulty... Julius Fazekas N2WN Tennessee Contest Group http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/index.ht; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00448.html (9,493 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:29:47 -0400; The idea of what to have as an exchange has been an issue for a while now. As a person who's first several contest efforts were with serialized exchanges, I was kind of surprised by the 599 automatic; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00454.html (8,628 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:45:05 -0600; W0QE proposed a standard set of abbreviations for the MARAC contest, but they have never been adopted by state QSO parties, where the state is implied, and therefore isn't necessary in the abbreviati; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00455.html (8,405 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:08:31 -0700 (PDT); I have a copy of this, and it makes a lot of sense. Of course, if it isn't adopted, it's still an orphan. Shame as it took a lot of work to put it together... Julius Fazekas N2WN Tennessee Contest Gr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00456.html (9,455 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:31:17 -0400; IIRC, one of the big reasons that it wasn't adopted was that it didn't do much for the state parties, made the entry a little more complicated - it is much easier to have a typo - and required them t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00460.html (8,704 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:09:07 -0600; Actually, one of things Larry did was to "encode" the abbreviations in such a way that a typo wouldn't usually alias to another (different) abbreviation. Sort of like built-in error checking. I agree; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00464.html (9,412 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:54:11 -0400; It didn't help that after MARAC had put their list together, some of the MARAC people started demanding that all state QSO parties switch to their abbrevriations. As I recall, one state QSO party did; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00465.html (11,671 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:39:19 -0500; WØQE did a thorough job of creating the 3,077 state/county codes. It's a shame the "Not invented here" syndrome has precluded his work to be leveraged as a QSO Party standard. Does anyone remember th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00467.html (11,053 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:33:32 -0700 (PDT); Well, that seems to be a general problem these days, not just contesting related. Emotions sometimes run rampant when simple logical discussion would be more effective and leave everyone in a win-win; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00485.html (13,649 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>; Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:13:26 -0400; Make no mistake about it. If the PAQSO were to start today, I would use the MARAC county standard acronyms. Now that made me smile. I regularly get my chops busted for introducing changes and adding; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00486.html (14,116 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:45:54 -0500; Make no mistake about it. If the PAQSO were to start today, I would use the MARAC county standard acronyms. using a standard. Now that made me smile. I regularly get my chops busted for introducing; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00494.html (19,506 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:25:04 -0400; Aren't we putting the cart before the horse here? (1) How big a problem is it really to handle multiple state QSO parties or multiple contests on the same weekend at the same time? How many contester; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00503.html (21,136 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:27:51 -0400; Ron Notarius W3WN wrote: "Guys, if we make it too complicated for the casual operator, the casual operator will not participate." After reading most of the thread, pertaining to this issue, someone h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00506.html (8,893 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:37:48 -0400; I thought my question to the original post was innocent enough. The thread took an odd direction though. I'm newer at contesting so maybe this is a problem that has been around for years or it is som; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00507.html (22,665 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:01:28 -0400; What would help the casual operator is also consistency. Imagine if you could pop into many contests and know what needs to be done? Do I need to send a serial number? My state? Both? Something else?; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00510.html (10,301 bytes)
19. Re: [CQ-Contest] multi-contesting (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:12:25 -0400; And that is EXACLY the point I was trying to make with my "Do serial numbers impact participation?" thread I started earlier. That discussion also took some strange turns. Finally someone GOT IT! 73; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00518.html (9,311 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]