Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+new\s+CQWW\s+scoring\s+rules\s+$100\%\s+conjecture$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+new\s+CQWW\s+scoring\s+rules\s+$100\%\s+conjecture$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] new CQWW scoring rules (100% conjecture) (score: 1): Author: kr2q@optimum.net; Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:09:51 +0000 (GMT); This topic is right up there with "cut numbers." :-) First, the current rules (points/mults) are well established. When someone chooses to go to a 2 point country instead of a 3 point country, they k; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00153.html (8,621 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] new CQWW scoring rules (100% conjecture) (score: 1): Author: Scott Currier <scott_currier@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 07:16:22 +0000; You're right about the CQ 160 contest. Got an idea. A minor change... Change the word country to multiplier in the scoring. States and provinces are multipliers as well as countries. Work someone in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00159.html (12,235 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] new CQWW scoring rules (100% conjecture) (score: 1): Author: José Nunes CT1BOH <ct1boh@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 09:36:00 +0000; CQWW is about populated areas, i.e USA/VE, Europe and Japan, working the DX. The problem is that Caribbean DX and Asia DX stations, will only get 2 and 1 points respectively when working their adjace; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00161.html (10,826 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] new CQWW scoring rules (100% conjecture) (score: 1): Author: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>; Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 11:12:38 +0100; Legacy curse of CQ WW contest is 2 points for inter-NA QSO which supossedly stimulates Carribean DX-peds. Most of people moved further South to 3 points islands. Increased EU participation makes plai; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00162.html (8,194 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]