Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+no\s+K5D\s+in\s+ARRL\?\s+Then\s+who\s+did\s+I\s+work\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+no\s+K5D\s+in\s+ARRL\?\s+Then\s+who\s+did\s+I\s+work\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] no K5D in ARRL? Then who did I work? (score: 1): Author: kr2q@optimum.net; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:23:04 +0000 (GMT); Hmmm. On day 2 on 40m (near the end), there was a K5D qrv. In fact, he was right on top of SV1 (who I still needed). When I figured out it was K5D, I turned the antenna south and he came up real loud; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00357.html (6,842 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] no K5D in ARRL? Then who did I work? (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:47:39 -0700; I worked him too and heard W0AIH work them. I think it was them. I had them on 40cw already but it was a blast to bust that huge pileup, K5D or not. "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a sl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00363.html (8,443 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] no K5D in ARRL? Then who did I work? (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:15:30 -0800 (PST); Don't know, but wish they had decided to play on 160 versus calling CQ JA on CW with only non-JA replies. If indeed it was them... The 160 SSB killed my run freq Sunday morning. Sorry "VB" whoever yo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00365.html (9,043 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]