Sorry folks...but ever try reading the RULES? IV. NUMBER EXCHANGE: Phone: RS report plus zone (i.e., 5705). CW: RST report plus zone (i.e., 57905). So we are all REQUIRED to send 5705 or 57905, irres
In a perfect world, penalties for busted qsos would be related to the reported signal report. If you give the guy a 59(9) and bust his info, you must be pretty bad at copying signals that are, by you
K8MR wrote: If you give him a 33(9) and bust his info, it may be partly the other guy's fault for being so weak, or the fault of neither of you that there was so much QRM and QRN, so therefore not so
I think that an actual RST report is pretty much useless as RST is simply an opinion at best. What may be useful is if logging software (voluntarily) records "S" meter readings and this was kept in a
It isn't so much whether the report is accurate (or not accurate) but rather whether it is actually "exchanged". Since the rules require it to be part of the exchange, it follows that it should be se
My two favorite "contests" right now are SKCC and CX. In both; seemingly accurate RSTs transferred. When I work a CQWW or an ARRL DX from my house in Burien, WA, 90% of all contacts are at an RST lev
I am so happy that I only speak Dutch. Rules are in English. So NO rules for me. 73 Henk PA5KT Op 23-07-2010 0:28, kr2q@optimum.net schreef: -- Henk Remijn PA5KT email: pa5kt@remijn.net www: www.pa5k
Ignorance of the rules doesn't make you immune to them. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
You can be immune if you don't submit a log. Ryan, N2RJ -- Sent from my mobile device Ryan A. Jairam, _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com