Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+re\:\s+LZ\s+DX\s+Contest\s+\.\.\.uniques\s+removed\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+re\:\s+LZ\s+DX\s+Contest\s+\.\.\.uniques\s+removed\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] re: LZ DX Contest ...uniques removed (score: 1): Author: "yt3t" <yt3t@absolutok.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:23:37 +0200; from Instead of removing uniques, who make it very difficult to be in anyone's log, I suggest that a committee remove those who make it easy in everyone's log, like KC1XX, K3LR, N2RM, HC8N... Workin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00097.html (8,771 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] re: LZ DX Contest ...uniques removed (score: 1): Author: "ak0a" <ak0a@kc.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:21:50 -0500; I might as well get in on this. Suppose there is a rare DX station in the contest, and somebody needs him for new country and HE is not in the contest and works him one time. That makes him unique so; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00102.html (10,661 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] re: LZ DX Contest ...uniques removed (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:16:01 -0400; At 11:23 AM 9/10/2003, yt3t wrote: Instead of removing uniques, who make it very difficult to be in anyone's log, I suggest that a committee remove those who make it easy in everyone's log, like KC1X; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00109.html (8,659 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] re: LZ DX Contest ...uniques removed (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 23:50:10 -0500 (CDT); I think some thought and logic should be applied. If the unique is likely a busted call, maybe it should be labeled as such. If someone logs W9SG in a CW contest and I show up in others' logs around; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00113.html (8,758 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]