Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+remote\s+use\s+of\s+Skimmer\s+data\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+remote\s+use\s+of\s+Skimmer\s+data\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] remote use of Skimmer data (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:47:18 -0400; Since Hal, N4GG posted his ingenious "what-if" yesterday, I have tried in vain to think of a legitimate use for data derived via Telnet from a remote CW Skimmer. Barring evidence of such a use, or ev; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00365.html (7,066 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] remote use of Skimmer data (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:23:22 +0000; The spots of stations calling cq are exactly equivalent to human entered dx spots from the same station, you can not tell them apart (unless you do busted call analysis on them at this point)... as h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00368.html (10,166 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] remote use of Skimmer data (score: 1): Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:49:26 -0400; This part of the Skimmer debate is of great interest to me. As the rules are currently written, all transmitting and receiving equipment must be inside the magic circle. Presumably, this refers to eq; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00381.html (13,356 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]