- 1. [CQ-Contest] scores - final thought (score: 1)
- Author: asciibaron@comcast.net
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 12:40:34 +0000
- having the printed scores in the NATIONAL AMATEUR RADIO organization's monthly publication of the contests they sponsor seems like a no brainer. i already get QST in my mailbox, now i have to surf th
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00157.html (8,302 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] scores - final thought (score: 1)
- Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 08:06:23 EST
- at what point will QST no longer be sent thru the mail and only be available on-line? then they can "publish" a 400 page "magazine" each and every month and i can print out any article i wish. won't
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00161.html (7,878 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] scores - final thought (score: 1)
- Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 08:24:29 -0600 (CST)
- Although it's great that things can be put on internet now and/or stored in a computer, sometimes I find I need the hard copy. The great thing about having things in digital form is that you only pri
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00175.html (9,209 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] scores - final thought (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@charter.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 09:20:15 -0800
- I guess that means I will have to put a computer in the "throne room" for my activities in there. 73 Tom W7WHY _________________________________________________ available on-line? then they can "publ
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00202.html (8,209 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] scores - final thought (score: 1)
- Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:25:40 -00
- Or move the throne into the ham-shack? 73, de Hans, K0HB -- http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00205.html (8,170 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] scores - final thought (score: 1)
- Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:40:21 -0800 (PST)
- Yeah, but then doesn't that put you in a new contest category because you can operate when others can't? Like single op-really assisted. John NE0P http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-cont
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00211.html (8,966 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] scores - final thought (score: 1)
- Author: "Russell Hill" <rustyhill@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:33:54 -0600
- Naah-- that is a category almost all of us can enter-- regardless of deed restrictions and covenants.... Admittedly some of us might claim certain disadvantages of one sort or another.... Another ill
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00216.html (10,390 bytes)
- 8. RE: [CQ-Contest] scores - final thought (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:28:18 -0500
- AND, with the proper filters, you can skip all the ads too!--Mike, WV2ZOW --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of asciibaro
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00229.html (8,909 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu