Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+sharp\s+filters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+sharp\s+filters\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] sharp filters (score: 1): Author: k3ft@starpower.net (Chuck Reville); Date: Sun Feb 23 19:25:52 2003; Greetings! Ragnar's post about "....or they use so narrow filters that unless a caller is within a few Hz of their passband( on CW ), they lose the station." brings up something I've wondered about.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00262.html (9,287 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] sharp filters (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin); Date: Mon Feb 24 00:10:09 2003; Good question. I answer them all. Operating in contess QRP, I do get to call CQ from time to time. When I do, I sometimes open the filters up to 1.8kHz (500Hz being the next step tighter). I'm amaze; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00266.html (9,191 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] sharp filters (score: 1): Author: k6ll@juno.com (Dave Hachadorian); Date: Sun Feb 23 23:18:27 2003; On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 19:25:52 -0800 "Chuck Reville" <k3ft@starpower.net> writes: Good question. If a caller is off frequency, the first decision is whether or not he is calling me or someone else. On; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00267.html (7,418 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] sharp filters (score: 1): Author: mark@concertart.com (Mark Beckwith); Date: Mon Feb 24 05:39:02 2003; When I was young and impressionable I remember being taught to tune around so as not to miss those operators not saavy enough to get on my frequency. I was never ever advised to pretend I didn't hea; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00268.html (9,293 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] sharp filters (score: 1): Author: n4bp@bellsouth.net (Bob Patten); Date: Mon Feb 24 07:07:01 2003; How do you know they are calling YOU??? With the practice of never sending the call of the station being called, this is a key question to me. I also will not answer a station calling off frequency -; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00269.html (9,450 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] sharp filters (score: 1): Author: kr6x@kr6x.com (Leigh S. Jones); Date: Mon Feb 24 07:21:36 2003; R.I.T. -- in fact all forms of transceive operation on CW -- came into being well after the creation of Q-signals. Isn't it about time that we had a revised list of Q-signals that includes one repres; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00272.html (7,863 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] sharp filters (score: 1): Author: w8car@buckeye-express.com (Dan Kovatch); Date: Mon Feb 24 13:40:45 2003; How about QRIT ? Then if he doesn't get it he might QRT? :) I think I would rather just work him off freq than mess with a Q signal that most guys would not understand -- Original Message -- From: "L; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00277.html (9,385 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] sharp filters (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John Laney); Date: Mon Feb 24 16:07:34 2003; I have often tried a very well-known Q signal in this situation without often getting results. If, for example, a station is calling me so high that I can't copy him through the QRM of the next runne; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00289.html (8,027 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] sharp filters (score: 1): Author: ww3s@zoominternet.net (WW3S); Date: Mon Feb 24 19:03:48 2003; If I'm in doubt you they are calling; I'll ask for a fill, even if I copied the exchange. Slows the rate a bit, but at least I'm sure who they are calling. about 'em; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00297.html (10,981 bytes)
10. Fw: [CQ-Contest] sharp filters (score: 1): Author: k7qq@netzero.net (k7qq); Date: Wed Feb 26 17:46:35 2003; QUACK's I find that when S & P ing I will call off freq a bit on the side I'm tuning from,(high to low) most of the time. This is more true for strong signals than weaker ones. If I call somone more; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-02/msg00354.html (8,938 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]