Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+spotting\.\.\.let\'s\s+get\s+back\s+on\s+track\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+spotting\.\.\.let\'s\s+get\s+back\s+on\s+track\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] spotting...let's get back on track (score: 1): Author: kr2q@optonline.net; Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:04:02 +0000 (GMT); Okay...this thing is going all over the place now. 1. Original topic was the J7OJ thing 2. I subsequently asked "what will you do with your log now? 3. Thread morphed into actually copying the callsi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00190.html (7,617 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] spotting...let's get back on track (score: 1): Author: "Jim Neiger" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:29:11 -0700; So helpful that KR2Q has defined the "track" for us. Thank you, Sir: The CQ WW DX Committee, of which KR2Q is a Member, continues to promote and foster "rules" that are so archaic, arbitrary, and app; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00191.html (7,342 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] spotting...let's get back on track (score: 1): Author: "Jamie Dupree NS3T" <ns3t@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:01:23 -0500; Just wondering Jim...what would you like to see changed/modified/clarified in the rules for CQWW? 73 Jamie NS3T _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00204.html (6,718 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]