- 1. [CQ-Contest] tnx 24hr (score: 1)
- Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 15:58:23 +0700
- I am guessing that the "first 24 hr" rule brought the big guns out tuning early because they found me running in the first hours instead of coming tuning around in the latter hours of the full weeken
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00159.html (7,024 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] tnx 24hr (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:11:46 -0400
- I don't know why that would be, Charly. It's not the first 24 calendar hours of the contest, but the first total 24 hours that the operator operates, in as many periods as he wishes. so long as the b
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00168.html (8,137 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] tnx 24hr (score: 1)
- Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:20:35 -0400 (EDT)
- Irrelevant. Conditions were just so good that we (at least here in W8) could actually hear your part of the world from the start. Definitely not always the case. And a few packet spots did not hurt e
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00178.html (7,555 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] tnx 24hr (score: 1)
- Author: john@kk9a.com
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:34:37 -0400
- I think this is a valid point. If a DX station is for 1/2 the contest it is less likely that you will work him, especially at night when the rates are slower. I believe most "classic" entries did mos
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00213.html (8,537 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] tnx 24hr (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:54:40 -0400
- I'm not persuaded. If we're talking about *serious* Classic entrants, then it seems to me they need to plan their time on both the high and low bands to produce the most return. For me, that means Sa
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00221.html (10,279 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu