- 21. Re: [CQ-Contest] unIDs (score: 1)
- Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 02:24:36 -0500
- Wait a minute! Do I understand your offer correctly - if I don't like the way some other guys are operating, I simply don't LOG them? Many times in the contest I literally wanted to send money to buy
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00005.html (9,665 bytes)
- 22. Re: [CQ-Contest] unIDs (score: 1)
- Author: "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:33:48 -0500
- Yuri, No that is not what I am saying. I am saying that the offender has not delivered on his obligation of the valid Q by not signing. And therefore while the Q is "loggable" it ultimately fails to
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00019.html (7,567 bytes)
- 23. Re: [CQ-Contest] unIDs (score: 1)
- Author: Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:00:23 -0800
- If you want to really get the message across, work the station again and send CALL PSE OM or something like that. Even a harmless question mark or two can get the message across. No running station i
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00034.html (8,854 bytes)
- 24. Re: [CQ-Contest] unIDs (score: 1)
- Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
- Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 08:45:00 -0500
- Ed, the "problem" of the DX station is to deliver his call. The "problem" of you, as a caller, is to get his call. Some guys only need the call to be sent once to copy it right. For some guys even 3
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00074.html (9,336 bytes)
- 25. Re: [CQ-Contest] unIDs (score: 1)
- Author: "Ivo Pezer I7/9A3A E73A" <ivo.pezer@alice.it>
- Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 10:54:52 +0100
- Hi Yuri With all respect, if a rare station decision not to ID should be considered brave/reasonable/strategic, the other station, who works for his own score, should also be fully respected when dec
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00083.html (14,252 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu