Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+which\s+contests\s+would\s+require\s+me\s+to\s+sign\s+AA7XT\/0\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] which contests would require me to sign AA7XT/0 (score: 1)
Author: William Hein <bill.aa7xt@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:04:01 +0000
When I first lived in Colorado, in the '90s, I had the call AA6TT. As a rule I did not sign "AA6TT/0" since this was my permanent station location, I wasn't portable. In CQ WW contests however I did
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00143.html (7,190 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] which contests would require me to sign AA7XT/0 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:45:05 -0500
The BARTG RTTY contests are the only ones that I know that require you to sign in the appropriate US call area. CQ does not require you to sign that way, but they will publish your score as AA7XT/0.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00144.html (8,870 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] which contests would require me to sign AA7XT/0 (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:06:32 -0700
If there ever was a CQWW rule that required signing /0, it predates my move to Colorado in 1981. I'm sure there is --some-- contest out of the 250+ contests that requires signing /0, but none of the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00145.html (8,469 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] which contests would require me to sign AA7XT/0 (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:18:28 -0500
The FCC required it prior to 1979. It was required by some contests up through the early 1980's and I seem to recall there was one that required it as late as the early 1990's. Which contests had the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00155.html (10,259 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] which contests would require me to sign AA7XT/0 (score: 1)
Author: iain macdonnell - N6ML <ar@dseven.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:38:38 -0800
Generally, in any contest where the call area counts as a multiplier, it seems to make sense that you should use the suffix. The WAEDC rules don't seem to explicitly require this, though, which I fin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00156.html (8,965 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] which contests would require me to sign AA7XT/0 (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:50:01 -0500
Bill, If I recall correctly, it wasn't all that long ago that the WPX contest required the "portable" identifier, which was logical since it in essence modifies your call sign, which provides the mul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00159.html (9,477 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] which contests would require me to sign AA7XT/0 (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:55:41 -0500
Call areas count as mults in WAEDC, but the rules specifically say that this is without regard for geographical location. On the other hand, there are several RTTY contests where call areas count as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00161.html (8,476 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] which contests would require me to sign AA7XT/0 (score: 1)
Author: BobK8IA@aol.com
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:11:54 -0500 (EST)
Hi Dave, Long time no see. Hope all is well. The WPX Rules say the following, "A station operating from a DXCC country different from that indicated by its call sign is required to sign portable." 73
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00162.html (9,878 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] which contests would require me to sign AA7XT/0 (score: 1)
Author: <n1cc@jlaporta.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 09:52:38 -0600
I find this a rule that is often violated by KL7 stations in the lower 48 ... and do find that offensive since I will go for a KL7 in a pileup and could miss a multiplier by taking the KL7 out-of-ord
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00163.html (11,783 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu