Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+why\s+non\-contesters\s+hate\s+us\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] why non-contesters hate us (score: 1)
Author: "doug smith" <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:50:39 -0500
OK, so I finally got enough laundry done to sit down & try CQing for a few minutes in the CQ WW SSB. Running 500 watts to a 7-el tribander at 20m, I'm not the loudest signal on the band but I'm not a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00373.html (9,228 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] why non-contesters hate us (score: 1)
Author: Hans K0HB <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:14:38 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
The rule seems to be "I >>AM LOUDER THAN YOU<<. I >>DESERVE<< to have this prime QRG." Your subject line is absolutely accurate. 73, de Hans, K0HB --Original Message-- _______________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00377.html (10,964 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] why non-contesters hate us (score: 1)
Author: "Gordon LaPoint" <n1mgo@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 11:14:05 -0400
This is a prime example! I saw several examples of this on Saturday. I would be working a station, and a BIG GUN contester starts calling CQ right on top of me, I work him so I know he can hear me, b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00385.html (11,461 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] why non-contesters hate us (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:40:09 -0700
Good for you, Doug. I have long thought that we should be "naming names" here as a matter of course. I had a similar problem some time back with a VE3 M/M, well, multi something. When I complained to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00404.html (8,878 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] why non-contesters hate us (score: 1)
Author: ALANNOTTAGE@aol.com
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 04:33:16 EDT
Good idea Jim. I think some of the Principles established by Dale Carnegie in his 'HTWF and Influence People', could be usefully applied in situations of that nature. Your suggestion looks like it mi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00425.html (8,268 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] why non-contesters hate us (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 04:44:06 -0400
Jim Smith wrote: "What do you think of the idea of sending an e-mail to the holder of the call with the info as to what happened, when, freq, etc and ask him if he approves of this style of operation
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00426.html (8,182 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] why non-contesters hate us (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:07:24 -0500
"Good for you, Doug. I have long thought that we should be "naming names" here as a matter of course." I agree 100% with one warning. Sometimes the guilty party is just a lid and may not have any int
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00429.html (8,804 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] why non-contesters hate us (score: 1)
Author: "doug smith" <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:17:56 -0500
I'd done just that - sent essentially the same message (worded slightly differently) to the address listed for the station on QRZ.com. It seems to be a club station with no one specific "owner". It d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00001.html (8,483 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] why non-contesters hate us (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:24:44 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:40:09 -0700, Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- While I am in agreement generally, please be careful with naming names. I remember vividl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00007.html (7,853 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu