Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+wpx\s+rules\s+conflict\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] wpx rules conflict (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:19:08 +0000
Which of the 3 sets of rules I have found is the official one?? http://www.cqwpx.com/rules.htm http://www.cqwpx.com/rules_2007.pdf http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/WPX_Contest_Rules_2007.pdf I haven't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00451.html (7,336 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] wpx rules conflict (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Cassel" <paul@ve3sy.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 22:15:56 -0400
I fully agree - M/2 can be interpreted as being a serial nbr for each of the two radios however undr Exchange it states Multi Station Multi operator stations the Serial Nbr is by band. The Wintest au
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00468.html (7,423 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] wpx rules conflict (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Pack, NX5M" <nx5m@txcyber.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 22:34:07 -0600
Serial numbers by band are ok in any of the multi classes. I say this because I asked. In multi-two, which is what we were going to do here until we ended up with an operator shortage, it was confirm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00471.html (10,026 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] wpx rules conflict (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Cassel" <paul@ve3sy.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 01:45:19 -0400
What we are seeing here in M/2 with Wintest is at the start of the test say Run 1 is on 80m with serial 1,2,3,4,5 and Run 2 is on 40 with serial 1,2,3,4 etc. Now later in the test Run 2 station opera
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00475.html (11,381 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] wpx rules conflict (score: 1)
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 08:08:10 -0000
Not meaning to start anything but..... What does it mean when it says that the "Maximum power allowed is 1500W total output"? Does than mean if you work all bands you can only use 250W per band? 73 -
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00476.html (9,644 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] wpx rules conflict (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Pack, NX5M" <nx5m@txcyber.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:26:29 -0600
You are ok with Wintest doing that as long as the cabrillo log file is indicating which transmitter made each qso. Consider this: Would it not be somewhat silly to send a serial number on a band that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00479.html (12,368 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] wpx rules conflict (score: 1)
Author: "Vladimir V. Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:37:24 -0000
One stack facing West, another stack facing East. Each stack has its own 1.5 KW PA. Both are connected to the same TRX. You shout CQ in both directions at once and cover both directions at once. 1.5
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00480.html (8,297 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu