Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+zero\s+pointers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+zero\s+pointers\s*$/: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

41. [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: Peter Dougherty <w2irt@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:19:01 -0500; What I did this weekend was when I heard a statesider CQing to little reply was a very quick "can I work you for a zone mult?" Put in squarely in his court. Nobody said no. Cheers, Peter, W2IRT _____; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00722.html (7,329 bytes)
42. [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: "Jamie Dupree NS3T" <ns3t@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:12:45 -0500; I understand NQ4I's complaints. He feels like too much time is being wasted on domestic QSO's that don't count. But then again, NQ4I is one of the loudest signals on the band and that attracts S&P co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00723.html (8,573 bytes)
43. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: "Martin Luther" <vk7gn@bigpond.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:04:25 +1100; It is far easier to work from PA0 to DL1 and receive 2 points than it is for a W0 to work a W6 on 80m...whats the logic in the former and not at least give the latter 1 point??? It is far easier to w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00002.html (7,266 bytes)
44. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:48:58 -0500 (GMT-05:00); I kind of cringe when these ops are referred to as "Bozo." These are the same ops we all want in our log in Sweepstakes, NAQP, WPX, etc. Most likely a large number of these guys are just trying to h; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00015.html (7,811 bytes)
45. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: <ku8e@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:32:44 -0500; Reminds me of a funny story.... I remember years ago my good friend K8MR protested the ZERO QSO point rule in CQ WPX contest ( a few times) by working only the USA and submitting a score of ZERO. I'm; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00029.html (7,359 bytes)
46. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com; Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 17:11:02 EST; I remember years ago my good friend K8MR protested the ZERO QSO point rule in CQ WPX contest ( a few times) by working only the USA and submitting a score of ZERO. I'm not sure what his high QSO coun; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00034.html (8,223 bytes)
47. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: "LA5HE Ragnar Otterstad" <la5he@otterstad.dk>; Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 23:29:54 +0100; Jim ... Maybe it's time for a CW effort ???? ALWAYS ! 73 Rag LA5HE _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00035.html (7,259 bytes)
48. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: 4X4KF <4x4kf@iarc.org>; Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:32:09 +0200; Best advice - ever. Long live the king...........CW. Michael 4X4KF -- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00055.html (8,173 bytes)
49. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: "Don Field" <don.field@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 10:51:02 +0000; This thread is getting exceedingly boring. How would it help if US stations got points for working each other? Yes, they would all end up with more points, but the leading US entrants would probably; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00057.html (8,212 bytes)
50. [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: <ku8e@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:09:51 -0500; I have to disagree with my friend and fellow FOC'er G3XTT... I am aware of only one major contest that everyone can work everyone, which is the CQ WPX contest. Unless, you would consider IARU, CQ 160; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00064.html (7,311 bytes)
51. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers (score: 1): Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@r66.ru>; Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 00:58:20 +0500; QSOs/Multipliers then say someone in South America or Africa but have a lower score because of the 3 vs 2 points per QSO they get. Changing the points per qso to the same for everyone would drastica; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00067.html (7,493 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 51
Page: [1] [2] [3]