Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]Packet\s+or\s+not\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]Packet\s+or\s+not\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest]Packet or not (score: 1): Author: "Dallas and Lucy" <ludal@dmv.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:06:33 -0500; Jim makes an excellent point, and that is only one example. Packet is not for everyone, but for some it's just peachy. It's why they make chocolate and vanilla. Dallas W3PP -- The world's top contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00456.html (9,832 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest]Packet or not (score: 1): Author: "Paul O'Kane" <paul@ei5di.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:24:42 -0000; Nothing wrong with chocolate and vanilla, but isn't there a time and a place for everything? My objection to packet is that, in the context of amateur radio contesting, it's an inappropriate mix of t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00477.html (10,743 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest]Packet or not (score: 1): Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:58:33 -0000; Is it time to quit beating this dead horse yet? 1. Packet isn't going anywhere. Do you guys really expect the guys that put their hard earned money and work into the packet networks, to shut them off; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00480.html (11,116 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]