Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Force\s+12\s+Talk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Towertalk\]\s+C31XR\s+\&\s+guy\s+wire\s+detuning\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Force\s+12\s+Talk\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Towertalk\]\s+C31XR\s+\&\s+guy\s+wire\s+detuning\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Force 12 Talk] Re: [Towertalk] C31XR & guy wire detuning (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:00:54 -0400; Joe, I certainly don't rule out the possibility of interaction between the EF-240S and the C-3E. In fact, the EF-240S is turned 90 degrees relative to the C-3E precisely because I noticed an SWR pert; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00696.html (8,012 bytes)
2. [Force 12 Talk] Re: [Towertalk] C31XR & guy wire detuning (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 10:47:34 -0600; When I modeled a 2L Yagi, I played with the reflector dimensions to see where it would become 'invisible'. Basically, any conductor Less Than 0.25 WL at the frequency of interest is nearly invisible; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00708.html (7,928 bytes)
3. [Force 12 Talk] Re: [Towertalk] C31XR & guy wire detuning (score: 1): Author: mitchell@wireless-engineers.com (Joe Mitchell); Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 09:32:34 -0400; Hi Pete, If your C3 is between the EF-240S and the guy wires, was the C3 not suspect? Sounds like it was cleared of potential interference with the 240S but I am wondering how you did that. Joe K4AW; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00729.html (9,557 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]