Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fwd\:\s+\[TowerTalk\]\s+BX\s+Series\s+Towers\]\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Fwd: [TowerTalk] BX Series Towers] (score: 1)
Author: hires@rust.net (Floyd Soo, W8RO)
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 09:43:04 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --16C77EC873B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The BX Series towers were never intended to support large ham ar
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00750.html (9,973 bytes)

2. [Fwd: [TowerTalk] BX Series Towers] (score: 1)
Author: Bill.Simpson@MCI.Com (Bill Simpson)
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 10:16 -0500 (CDT)
Stan, I have had an HDBX 48 with the 56' section added for over 15 years. The T2X is in the top of the 48' section. This tower has seen over SEVENTY mph winds. Frank, Guess what is on top? A two elem
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00762.html (10,839 bytes)

3. [Fwd: [TowerTalk] BX Series Towers] (score: 1)
Author: harpole@pegasus.cc.ucf.edu (Charles H. Harpole)
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 18:17:46 -0400 (EDT)
I have had good luck with HDBX Rohn also. Now, I have some horiz. plates tying the joints together at the place where the sections join, but those just came with the tower at shippment and were there
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00781.html (7,658 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu