Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fwd\:\s+\[TowerTalk\]\s+GPS\s+receivers\]\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Fwd: [TowerTalk] GPS receivers] (score: 1)
Author: Steve <steveac@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 15:48:39 -0400
I appreciate the helpful replies to my inquiry regarding GPS receivers, some to the reflector and others directly to me. Perhaps I should have been more specific regarding what I hope to accomplish w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00379.html (8,980 bytes)

2. Re: [Fwd: [TowerTalk] GPS receivers] (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 07:52:50 -0500
My friends who claim to be educated in matters of GPS say that because of the manner in which the system is modulated for security reasons, consumer units are limited to accuracy on the order of seve
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00420.html (8,837 bytes)

3. Re: [Fwd: [TowerTalk] GPS receivers] (score: 1)
Author: Michael Urich <ka5cvh@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 08:08:32 -0500
My Magellan 315 seems to be within +/- 3 meters on elevation when compared to mountain pass signs in West TX. And using Dec values of Lat-Lon it will regularly repeat down to the 5th decimal place. S
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00423.html (8,802 bytes)

4. Re: [Fwd: [TowerTalk] GPS receivers] (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:38:40 -0400
At 08:52 AM 9/20/2004, Jim Brown wrote: My friends who claim to be educated in matters of GPS say that because of the manner in which the system is modulated for security reasons, consumer units are
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00431.html (10,615 bytes)

5. Re: [Fwd: [TowerTalk] GPS receivers] (score: 1)
Author: "Tower (K8RI)" <tower@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:22:08 -0400
I'm having to add quotes as the message must have been in HTML originally. At 08:52 AM 9/20/2004, Jim Brown wrote: My friends who claim to be educated in matters of GPS say that because of the manner
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00435.html (13,884 bytes)

6. Re: [Fwd: [TowerTalk] GPS receivers] (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:50:11 -0700
At 10:38 AM 9/20/2004 -0400, Pete Smith wrote: At 08:52 AM 9/20/2004, Jim Brown wrote: My friends who claim to be educated in matters of GPS say that because of the manner in which the system is modu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00438.html (12,635 bytes)

7. Re: [Fwd: [TowerTalk] GPS receivers] (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:04:00 -0500
Huh? I said "several meters" in plan and you said "a few meters" in plan. Jim _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless We
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00440.html (8,606 bytes)

8. Re: [Fwd: [TowerTalk] GPS receivers] (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:41:47 -0700
Huh? I said "several meters" in plan and you said "a few meters" in plan. Jim Sorry, I was referring to the SA (Selective Availability) stuff, not the horizontal accuracy... 15-20m absolute accuracy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00441.html (9,998 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu