Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fwd\:\s+Re\:\s+Topband\:\s+Long\s+Path\s+Direction\!\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fwd\:\s+Re\:\s+Topband\:\s+Long\s+Path\s+Direction\!\]\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Fwd: Re: Topband: Long Path Direction!] (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:24:45 -1000; What is the half power beamwidth of the most directive antenna that any of you have for receiving on 160 meters? What about the half power beamwidth of the most directive rotatable antenna that you h; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00344.html (8,185 bytes)
2. RE: [Fwd: Re: Topband: Long Path Direction!] (score: 1): Author: "Richard Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:34:41 -0800; I used to have 1 wl beverages every 30 degrees, and there was only a few dB difference between the correct beverage and its nearest neighbor. With a 60 degree difference, there was a drastic loss of; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00348.html (7,917 bytes)
3. Re: [Fwd: Re: Topband: Long Path Direction!] (score: 1): Author: John Kaufmann <john.kaufmann@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:23:04 -0500; I never give direction of arrival in exact degrees because you are right that it is not that easy to estimate with any accuracy with the types of directional antennas most of us use. For that reason; /archives//html/Topband/2004-03/msg00353.html (10,143 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]