Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+\(no\s+subject\)\s*$/: 6384 ]

Total 6384 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:23:31 -0500
It's all the communication that Karlnet does....it just got lost...I'm sure. ;)
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00068.html (15,978 bytes)

142. Re: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:49:19 -0700
IMHO, the PoE voltage issue needs to be fixed forthwith. Not very good having to select different PS for different runs of CAT5e. Not to mention my use, can't use 24vdc on the thing...most frustratin
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00069.html (17,675 bytes)

143. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:51:43 -0400
What is the POE voltage issue? You have to use a specific voltage at the board? [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] good mention lost...I'm for is of get But using they antennas
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00070.html (19,441 bytes)

144. Re[2]: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Jon Loosle" <web@s1i.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:38:16 -0600
How was the head issue resolved? ** REPLY SEPARATOR **
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00071.html (17,058 bytes)

145. Re: Re[2]: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 20:42:08 -0700
Use a fan. How was the head issue resolved? ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinf
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00072.html (17,834 bytes)

146. RE: Re[2]: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 00:30:08 -0500
Well, we do use a fan in our indoor enclosure! But we have solved the heat issue by SPEEDING UP the processor and SLOWING DOWN the memory. The memory was overheating and that apparently caused the co
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00073.html (19,061 bytes)

147. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 00:39:11 -0500
Correct! The voltage at the board is the issue! Kevin ** Kevin R. Knuth Business Development Manager North America 260-424-9690 Regional Office 614-822-5275 Corporate Office kknuth@karlnet.com www.ka
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00074.html (20,133 bytes)

148. Re: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: John Tully <tully@mikrotik.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:10:20 +0300
There is a standard called 802.3af and if the board design follows that standard, there are no problems. Of course the RouterBOARD 200 follows those and we have cable runs up to 150m even with POE (I
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00075.html (17,551 bytes)

149. [Karlnet] Routerboard (score: 1)
Author: Peter Dordik <dordik@presov.viapvt.sk>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:40:02 +0200
Routerboard 230 kit seems interesting. We still have not HCL for Turbocell... But i know, that RTL8139 NICs are supported. So i am worry, that NIC (NSC DP83816 based) will be not compatible with Turb
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00076.html (9,730 bytes)

150. RE: Re[2]: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 08:59:36 -0400
What is the processor running at now? [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] apparently issue. for of lost...I'm is of get But using
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00077.html (21,319 bytes)

151. RE: Re[2]: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:00:00 -0400
Do you want a unit on a tower 400' up that has a fan in it? [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] lost...I'm is of get But using antennas
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00078.html (18,620 bytes)

152. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: Travis Lists <travis-lists@netwaveinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:03:52 -0400
Nate, We are doing the same with our systems... WR on new WiPOPs and maintaining the Karlnet stuff until the Orinoco gear gives up (don't think it will take long for that). Are you having good luck w
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00079.html (22,257 bytes)

153. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Nate McLain" <nate@wireless-guy.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:10:43 -0500
We are putting our 1st 900meg site up next week. With 2 more coming online with 3 weeks. We have done some testing at another location in the state and it works really well. Even from the vehicle wit
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00080.html (23,037 bytes)

154. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "John Benson" <john@mwutah.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:34:53 -0600
Nate, How much does the CPE cost? John We are putting our 1st 900meg site up next week. With 2 more coming online with 3 weeks. We have done some testing at another location in the state and it works
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00081.html (23,466 bytes)

155. [Karlnet] CIR, MPD (score: 1)
Author: "office" <office@intersat-telecom.ro>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:03:45 +0300
Dear Kevin, KarlNet presents two important features of Turbocell: Committed Information Rate (CIR) and Maximum Propagation Delay (MPD). When will be available both features? There are any additional
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00082.html (7,825 bytes)

156. [Karlnet] Permit Ethernet Broadcast? (score: 1)
Author: "Brendan O'Bra" <brendan@pvbb.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:08:20 -0700
Hi, Anyone care to shed some light on the "Permit Ethernet Broadcasts" and "Permit Ethernet Multicasts" settings, such as whether or not they're required, good, bad or other? I can't seem to find any
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00083.html (7,480 bytes)

157. RE: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Nate McLain" <nate@wireless-guy.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:37:23 -0500
Nate Nate, How much does the CPE cost? John --Original Message-- From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of Nate McLain Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 8:1
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00084.html (23,980 bytes)

158. RE: [Karlnet] CIR, MPD (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 13:37:36 -0400
"CIR" is already there, and why do you need "MPD"? [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] be details
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00085.html (8,927 bytes)

159. RE: Re[2]: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Caleb Carroll" <karlnet@pathcom.ca>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:48:02 -0600
Kevin, What exactly is the "heat issue" and "corruption issue"? Is this a PoE issue only? voltage related issue only? Please, explain this fully. Also, is there any way to identify the small "percent
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00086.html (20,995 bytes)

160. RE: Re[2]: [Karlnet] new karlnet units (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:33:51 -0500
Caleb, The heat issue caused memory to be corrupted and therefore the unit would fail. It is a PoE issue only, straight power did not seem to cause the issue. Small percentage is a little harder: My
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-10/msg00087.html (22,288 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu