Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+$no\s+subject$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+$no\s+subject$\s*$/: 6384 ]

Total 6384 documents matching your query.

301. Re: [Karlnet] site survey and antenna alignment (score: 1): Author: "Bernie Beckel" <bernie@etech-connect.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:30:25 -0600; If you are using flat pannel antennas get a small speed square. It has a flat side and that side goes onto the face of the antenna and the other side you can use for aiming the antenna. It is very lo; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00021.html (14,555 bytes)
302. RE: [Karlnet] was: Engenius CB3 Questions (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 12:46:38 -0400; Kevin, I don't see any mention of grounding the units in the documentation Thanks, Dan [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] supply FCC a are of as cost anymore! and of suspect -- [This E-mail scann; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00022.html (21,048 bytes)
303. RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS? (score: 1): Author: "Jon Loosle" <web@s1i.net>; Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 10:05:53 -0600; How did you shut off the multicast? tony ** REPLY SEPARATOR **; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00023.html (8,833 bytes)
304. [Karlnet] RG+ SOHO licenses (score: 1): Author: Paul Horak <paulhorak@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 23:37:26 -0700 (PDT); I was just wondering - where is the 1 user limitation on the RG+ SOHO licenses? From my understanding it is on the ethernet port i.e. only 1 MAC can be bridged through the ethernet port. So if the RG; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00024.html (7,239 bytes)
305. RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS? (score: 1): Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 07:28:07 -0600; We set multicast messages to be pruned. In the Bridge setup. And often set them to be disabled all together How did you shut off the multicast? tony ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** ____________________________; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00025.html (9,379 bytes)
306. RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS? (score: 1): Author: "Travis Lists" <travis-lists@netwaveinternet.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:07:52 -0400; What other effects might show up if we prune multicast? Travis We set multicast messages to be pruned. In the Bridge setup. And often set them to be disabled all together How did you shut off the mul; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00026.html (10,057 bytes)
307. [Karlnet] Ping jitter problem---only one direction (score: 1): Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 08:08:44 -0700; I've noticed that pinging from any of our clients to the NOC results in pings all over the map, from 20mS-300mS. However, ping back from the NOC to the client, the pings are stable, and low, 8-30mS.; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00027.html (8,038 bytes)
308. Re: [Karlnet] Ping jitter problem---only one direction (score: 1): Author: Roger Boggs <rogerboggs@att.net>; Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 11:12:53 -0400; Seems like that would be kinda normal for a polling system. The base can ping the client whenever he pleases, but the when the client pings, he's got to wait for his turn to come around in the poll c; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00028.html (8,573 bytes)
309. RE: [Karlnet] Posibble DoS? (score: 1): Author: Peter Dordik <dordik@presov.viapvt.sk>; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:24:57 +0200; I assume, that "blocking of ethernet multicast" at AP side is technical solution for option "deny inter-client traffic" at 802.11b interface. Peter Citcia Jon Loosle <web@s1i.net>:; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00029.html (8,155 bytes)
310. Re: [Karlnet] Ping jitter problem---only one direction (score: 1): Author: Paul Horak <paulhorak@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:10:18 -0700 (PDT); Hi Norm, I suspect that if you put some data through the connection i.e. do a download then the ping times will come down. I've noticed this too, but concluded it was normal and not a problem. Just n; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00030.html (8,878 bytes)
311. [Karlnet] Weird lockup (score: 1): Author: helio@compuland.com.br; Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 14:26:37 -0300; Hi: Yesterday, in two different sites, about 10 miles apart, two Karlnet bridges hanged simultaneously... Both of them are the WPG01 (dual pcmcia karlnet board). Both of them connected to nobreaks. B; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00031.html (7,550 bytes)
312. Re: [Karlnet] Weird lockup (score: 1): Author: "Brendan O'Bra" <brendan@pvbb.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:35:27 -0700; Yes, but on a 4.27 rg1000 satellite, talking to a 4.27 Ap1000. Never did figure it out, just replaced the rg1000 with a new one and so far so good (knock on wood) -- Original Message -- From: <helio@; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00032.html (8,588 bytes)
313. RE: [Karlnet] Weird lockup (score: 1): Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 15:57:39 -0500; yes...it souunds like a bad board -Charles --Original Message-- From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of helio@compuland.com.br Sent: Tuesday, September; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00033.html (8,261 bytes)
314. Re: [Karlnet] Weird lockup (score: 1): Author: "Bernie Beckel" <bernie@etech-connect.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 19:03:25 -0600; I have 2 of these boards and both were locking up at the drop of a hat untill I put a small heat sink on the pcmcia card and used a 12 volt, 1.5 amp power supply on them. I only use them as temp. spa; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00034.html (8,586 bytes)
315. Re: [Karlnet] Weird lockup (score: 1): Author: "Brett Hays" <bretth@htonline.net>; Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:24:10 -0500; Yes, I have seen that happen a few times. No explanation any of the times and after a power cycle, all was well and is still working (knock on wood) I attributed it to fluctuations in ac power. In th; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00035.html (8,915 bytes)
316. [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:43:36 -0500; I have an Orinoco COR v4.15 with about 14 RG-1000 clients and 1 AP-1000 that is serving as a POP and backhaul for the small pop. In all, about 35 clients are going through this AP, in on way or anoth; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00036.html (9,024 bytes)
317. Re: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1): Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:24:55 -0700; Hi Bob, I think that I may be seeing the same thing. I noticed that sometime this summer as I added clients to our WIPOP the jitter from the clients to the AP/NOC really went bad (as previously menti; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00037.html (10,928 bytes)
318. Re: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:29:16 -0500; many of my RG clients are using the new 4.41 fw. I wonder if that is the cause? Can I downgrade these? this on to is Satellite/Base. for errors constantly, times. I; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00038.html (12,211 bytes)
319. Re: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1): Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:17:08 -0700; I'm sure you can. It may be that the problem showed up when I went to 4.43 on the base. I went the other way and upgraded all my clients to 4.43 while trying to fix this problem....no change. I haven; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00039.html (13,750 bytes)
320. RE: [Karlnet] Strange ping loss (score: 1): Author: "Steve Deaton" <steve@texasbb.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:20:35 -0500; For whatever it's worth, I just found a NAT problem. This will only apply if you're running NAT on the device that is locking up. Some clients behind the NAT AP were running something that was genera; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-09/msg00040.html (12,391 bytes)

Current List: 301 - 320
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]