I'm not sure what your question is if you gave each radio a DIRECT /30, then you wouldn't be able to have more than one Satellite talk to that radio (e.g., you only have 1 IP left w/ the /30) Better
Originally I was thinking of this 10.10.10.1/30 - DIRECT - 1 (radio would have 10.10.10.2) 10.10.11.1/30 - DIRECT - 1 (radio would have 10.10.11.2) but I didn't test this. Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadb
Oops, I should have put interface 2 But basically I was going to add DIRECT routes of /30 for EACH radio Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Sytems dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.co
and would those radios be PtP radios? b/c you'd only have one IP to spare w/ a /30 Oops, I should have put interface 2 But basically I was going to add DIRECT routes of /30 for EACH radio Dan Metcalf
No It would be PtMP I would add multiple DIRECT routes for each radio so I would have an entry for each /30 network. So the AP would use 1 IP address for each /30 network Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadba
Yes, it is still shared, I was just wondering if there was a benefit for doing it one way or the other? Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Sytems dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com
probably not, as it will end up eating more of your AP's processing power Yes, it is still shared, I was just wondering if there was a benefit for doing it one way or the other? Dan Metcalf Wireless