We have an ap with 37 clients on it (flashrom). It has been running fine, although I know it is heavily loaded. We are going to sectors on this tower next week. We just added our first two KN-50's to
Are you on an omni? tower These about those and _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
Brett, I noticed that overall latency in our network jumped from <10mS stable to in the 20-30mS average, some in the 100s mS unstable range as we added KN-50s to the mix it seems. I'm not sure what h
as we were KN-50s. have AP to that I KN-50's right. I have been seeing latency as well, but I wasn't sure what it was.. normally its around 20ms or lower - but since we added a bunch of kn50's and r
showed Went new channel, follow). related..does boonies we are seeing this same problem and if you let it sit for up to 5 minutes does it come back on its own? Can you do a link test? If you let it
I don't think mine resumed, but now that I think about it, I am not sure I ever gave it five minutes...this is a real problem. If it resumes on its own, I wonder why switching to another channel will
I wish karlnet would allow us to upgrade the kn50's.... When you switch channel's, you do reboot the AP, do all of your kn50's support autoroam? [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] sure I will the
No, we were told channel scan is not supported in the KN-50's? Is it? That would be a huge help in this situation. _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNot
it kinda works for me. That _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
Kinda of works? It seems to work ok for us.... [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] it? kn50's not channel to station channels worked KN-50's to old didn't the to 5 -- [This E-mail scanned for viru
I can only say that I have run into this problem when one station was conflicting with another station. This problem was resolved when one of the remote stations was renumbered. This was a problem be
Renumbered? What do you mean? [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] of sure will the fine. the -- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _______________________________________________ K
I'm not feeling the love for Karlnet right now...... I'll say that I have gotten some e-mail that they are working on the problem (similar to what was posted to the list) but I notified them of the i
Ok, I'm an idiot. I didn't state the nature of the conflict. This case was IP related....so might want to make sure that there are no overlaps. Since this is a problem on the base station possibly, y
I understand that, I think any WISP expects the equipment to work 100%, bugs/failures/problems are not acceptable, I don't have the time or money to be replacing or fixing bugging hardware... I don't
Well, in our case its definitely not an IP address issue [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] case overlaps. to of sure will the fine. the -- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] ____
Do you mean an IP conflict? _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
All, Software releases are planned to be available for the KN-50 as soon as the license-it.com website infrastructure has been modified to add support for it. KarlNet Technical Support http://www.kar
Whats the ETA though? [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] the for 100%, I I another switching to KN-50's that's out for resume -- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _______________