Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+KN205\s+vs\.\s+Soekris\s+4511\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] KN205 vs. Soekris 4511 (score: 1)
Author: "Matthew Kolbo" <matt@mountainwav.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 14:31:38 +0900
Which is better, the KN205 or the Soekris 4511? I can see the specs on the 4511, but Karlnet's site doesn't have any detailed info on the KN205. Does anyone know what the processor, RAM, etc is on th
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-03/msg00083.html (7,486 bytes)

2. Re: [Karlnet] KN205 vs. Soekris 4511 (score: 1)
Author: "Didi Harijanto" <didi@sby.dnet.net.id>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:07:38 +0700
net4511-30: 100 Mhz CPU, 64 Mbyte SDRAM, 2 Ethernet, 1 Serial, CF socket, 1 Mini-PCI socket, Single PC-Card socket, PoE. KN-105/KN-205 Specifications CPU STPC Elite at 133 MHz, SDRAM 16MB on-board SD
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-03/msg00084.html (8,377 bytes)

3. Re: [Karlnet] KN205 vs. Soekris 4511 (score: 1)
Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:05:59 -0800
Anyone have any ideas on what the ideal operating temperature on the bench should be? I've got a KN-205 w/two 200mW cards slotted in an enclosure with no fan, and it seems to want to run about 116 de
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-03/msg00085.html (9,813 bytes)

4. RE: [Karlnet] KN205 vs. Soekris 4511 (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:06:06 -0500
I think karlnet said max temp was 175*F 205%20User%27s%20Guide.zip -- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@W
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-03/msg00086.html (11,211 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu