Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Re\:\s+stats\s+on\s+prism\/intersil\s+200mw\s+cards\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Re\:\s+stats\s+on\s+prism\/intersil\s+200mw\s+cards\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] Re: stats on prism/intersil 200mw cards (score: 1): Author: David Dietrich <david@countrysky.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:18:11 -0500; Hello Dan, Wireless link test. The actual links have been great! I like to use the link test while fine tuning. I've been using pings, tests back to my servers, etc. Works fine but takes longer to fi; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-08/msg00027.html (7,340 bytes)
2. RE: [Karlnet] Re: stats on prism/intersil 200mw cards (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:13:27 -0400; I find the signal reported is accurate on v4.45 when doing a link test from a lucent radio side (ie: ap1000 w/ lucent and rg1000 as cpe w/ smc) signals are correct Noise is not [mailto:karlnet-bounce; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-08/msg00028.html (8,674 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]