Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+SNR\s+at\s+base\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+SNR\s+at\s+base\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] SNR at base? (score: 1): Author: "George Minich" <gminich@toshiba.ca>; Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:29:57 -0500; Would you guys consider a 19db SNR at the base of an amped setup a good SNR? Some customers further out have a 15 to 17db. This seems low, but is about the best I was able to score. This is through t; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-11/msg00100.html (11,473 bytes)
2. RE: [Karlnet] SNR at base? (score: 1): Author: "Nate McLain" <nate@ctrail.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:37:46 -0600; What are you using for an antenna on the base and what is the distance of the satellite? Nate Would you guys consider a 19db SNR at the base of an amped setup a good SNR? Some customers further out h; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-11/msg00102.html (11,996 bytes)
3. Re: [Karlnet] SNR at base? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:54:45 -0600; sounds kind of weak for an amped signal. Are you using an amp at the AP as well? But what distance are we talking about here...what do the RF calcs say and what is the noise floor? is grids; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-11/msg00104.html (12,637 bytes)
4. Re: [Karlnet] SNR at base? (score: 1): Author: "George Minich" <gminich@toshiba.ca>; Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 21:11:13 -0500; To all that have asked: I am using a 19 dbi grid on the satellite that is about 1.5 miles from the base. The base antenna is a 12dbi Tiltek with 120 degree coverage. The noise hovers in the -75db reg; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-11/msg00111.html (14,580 bytes)
5. RE: [Karlnet] SNR at base? (score: 1): Author: "John Maxwell" <john.maxwell@rockywave.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:39:57 -0700; The vertical sector change to horizontal will certainly help. He have a system with an 18dB amp and are seeing s/n ratios about 5-10dB and they generally work. It's not the best signal to noise ratio; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-11/msg00112.html (15,616 bytes)
6. Re: [Karlnet] SNR at base? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 01:20:12 -0600; is 120 noise a another calcs but to Email; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-11/msg00113.html (15,998 bytes)
7. Re: [Karlnet] SNR at base? (score: 1): Author: Roger Boggs <rogerboggs@att.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 06:20:26 -0500; He's using an amplifier, though. That's probably going to be the noise reading on any channel he chooses. Without the amp, it'd probably end up being down around 90 or so. At 01:20 AM 11/14/02 -0600,; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-11/msg00114.html (10,707 bytes)
8. Re: [Karlnet] SNR at base? (score: 1): Author: "George Minich" <gminich@toshiba.ca>; Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:02:13 -0500; Amplifiers are well know to introduce noise into the mix. I am going to go horizontal and hopefully some of the noise will vanish (5db or so). George that bit and at satellite. AP 19dbi if about 5-6m; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-11/msg00115.html (17,514 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]