Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Strange\s+retransmit\s+problem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Strange\s+retransmit\s+problem\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem (score: 1): Author: "Charles Chia Sheng Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 14:15:05 -0600; it should not -Charles If I only have a single user at 256Kbps on the link, will his speed degrade? It should not, but it looks like it may. Thanks from ______________________________________________; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00119.html (13,712 bytes)
22. RE: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:12:04 -0500 (EST); Hello, As I said, this problem only occurs for a few minutes, where a single satellite is hogging all resources. No other satellites get polled. I don't believe that this "fix" would necessarily have; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00120.html (10,752 bytes)
23. RE: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 16:54:09 -0500; Chris, I agree with your point about not needing to fix a constant situation. I would be much more interested in Signal level in dBm as opposed to signal to noise ratio. And since the interference se; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00121.html (11,889 bytes)
24. RE: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 18:24:39 -0500; Kevin, On the link we see a huge # of re-trans, the Signal is about -75dBm and noise varys from -82dBm to -90dBm Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Systems http://www.wbsysnet.com/ 877-685-0578 dan.metca; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00122.html (13,748 bytes)
25. RE: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem (score: 1): Author: <bhrbek@bextreme.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 17:36:45 -0600; I would imagine that with a 7 dbm SNR, you are having other problems as well. What is a LOT of re-trans? I've got some VERY good links, +35dbm SNR with 30,000+ retrans and only 900,000 transmits. Tha; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00123.html (11,886 bytes)
26. RE: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 22:33:42 -0500; NO other problems at all besides the # of retransmits, you must be using amps to get +35dBm snr? Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Systems http://www.wbsysnet.com/ 877-685-0578 dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00124.html (14,008 bytes)
27. RE: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem (score: 1): Author: "Demarc $tony$ 908-996-7995" <tonylist@wwwbiz.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 00:15:11 -0500; Dan The S/R is from 7 to 15 dBi this is one the low side. What is the system design from customer to AP? Somewhere we need to get the S/R to a stable 20ish to increase performance. Sincerely Tony Mor; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00125.html (15,969 bytes)
28. RE: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 08:41:32 -0500; Using 12db antenna's w/ the lucent cards at 3miles doesn't give you much to play with for signal/fade margin Dan Metcalf Wireless Broadband Systems http://www.wbsysnet.com/ 877-685-0578 dan.metcalf@w; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00126.html (17,958 bytes)
29. Re: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:45:02 -0500; Kevin Knuth wrote: Chris, I agree with your point about not needing to fix a constant situation. I would be much more interested in Signal level in dBm as opposed to signal to noise ratio. And since; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00127.html (10,940 bytes)
30. Re: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem (score: 1): Author: Roger Boggs <rogerboggs@att.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 13:54:41 -0500; These are very good signal and noise figures. If you are getting retransmission rates of more than 3 percent (transmits/retransmits x 100) and you see no indications of interference (where the noise; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00128.html (12,048 bytes)
31. Re: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:05:00 -0500 (EST); Hello, I get less than 0.5% retransmits in normal times...I believe this thread has lost its meaning. I am saying there is a condition where a normal working setup suddenly becomes unstable and a sin; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00129.html (10,678 bytes)
32. Re: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem (score: 1): Author: Roger Boggs <rogerboggs@att.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:16:41 -0500; Take that satellite offline and the world is okay again? Go find out what that person is doing, and make them stop. Are they running a server on their end? I've not been following this thread too clo; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00132.html (11,180 bytes)
33. Re: [Karlnet] Strange retransmit problem (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:09:23 -0500 (EST); Hello, I am sorry to say, but you are very off base. Please read the original post. This is a ERROR condition in Turbocell, not a nasty client or a denial of service of some sort. The number of retra; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-12/msg00134.html (9,994 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 33
Page: [1] [2]