Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Stupid\s+question\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Stupid\s+question\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] Stupid question? (score: 1): Author: "Bill Fisher" <fisher@akorn.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 02:19:10 -0400; Why isn't the access list set per port? I mean, I could have customers on one port that are authenticated by radius (lets say) and the other port doing ptp back haul where I would want only one mac a; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00046.html (6,908 bytes)
2. RE: [Karlnet] Stupid question? (score: 1): Author: "Support" <support@karlnet.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 09:01:34 -0400; The authenication is done at a server that doesn't know what port someone comes in on. All the server knows is that a MAC came to it and it needs to either pass or deny. Doug Harman KarlNet, Inc. 525; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00048.html (8,016 bytes)
3. RE: [Karlnet] Stupid question? (score: 1): Author: "Support" <support@karlnet.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 11:15:10 -0400; I checked with engineering and was told that we are adding support so the radius server will get port information and be able to use this to authenicate users. It won't be on the next release, but po; /archives//html/Karlnet/2002-06/msg00051.html (9,328 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]