Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Thanks\s+to\s+Zcomax\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Thanks\s+to\s+Zcomax\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Wisp Notes" <wisp-notes@s1-i.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 09:46:31 -0700; Just wanted to pop in here and say thanks to Tony Morella. We talked with him last week about some things with Karlnet we needed to fix. We bought the Zcomax cards and installed them as he directed.; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00001.html (8,381 bytes)
2. Re: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 11:58:49 -0500; Wisp Notes wrote: Just wanted to pop in here and say thanks to Tony Morella. We talked with him last week about some things with Karlnet we needed to fix. We bought the Zcomax cards and installed the; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00002.html (9,541 bytes)
3. Re: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Wisp Notes" <wisp-notes@s1-i.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 11:26:45 -0700; You are right Chris. They are not entirely junk. 98% of our network is using those cards. The biggest problem is each of those cards has an internal antenna and recieves a LOT of noise especially on; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00006.html (11,306 bytes)
4. Re: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Caleb Carroll" <karlnet@pathcom.ca>; Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 19:27:50 -0700; Yes, the built in antenna on Orinoco cards receives alot of local signal from other sources (interference). I'm doing the same thing myself with the Prism 2.5 cards in some of our Base Stations. The; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00007.html (13,242 bytes)
5. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 22:13:40 -0500; FYI- You can purchase OEM versions of the Agere card without the black plastic antenna. This reduces interference! Kevin Yes, the built in antenna on Orinoco cards receives alot of local signal from; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00008.html (13,788 bytes)
6. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Ben Polson" <bsp@bandwave.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 21:04:31 -0800; Kevin, Can you share a little more information on this with the list please? I, for one, would like to know where I might be able to get a few for testing, etc. Thanks! -Ben.; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00009.html (15,774 bytes)
7. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 07:05:50 -0500; Sure, The OEM version of the card DOES NOT have the little black plastic piece on it. What you will find are 2 antenna ports. It is important you use the correct port! The card can recieve signal fro; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00012.html (17,332 bytes)
8. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Ben Polson" <bsp@bandwave.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 05:47:56 -0800; Thank you very much Kevin. -Ben.; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00013.html (19,564 bytes)
9. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Brian H. Oak" <oakb@infosystems1.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 11:20:43 -0700; We purchase the standard internal dipole antenna ORiNOCO cards for cheap (<$40 for Silver), and just remove the internal antennas. We have found that this cuts WAY back on the noise and interference; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00014.html (19,278 bytes)
10. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Ben Polson" <bsp@bandwave.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 10:21:40 -0800; Cool Brian. You wouldn't happen to have any documentation or digital images of the solder points that need to be removed and any gotchas to watch out for when doing this, would you? -Ben.; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00015.html (21,896 bytes)
11. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Brian H. Oak" <oakb@infosystems1.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 12:02:08 -0700; The main trick is figuring out how to remove the black plastic cover without destroying it. I use a small straight-blade (flat) screwdriver for this. Holding the card in both hands, I use both thumbs; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00016.html (24,016 bytes)
12. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Ben Polson" <bsp@bandwave.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 12:28:25 -0800; This is great information! Thanks much Brian! -Ben. <snip>; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00017.html (11,800 bytes)
13. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:23:22 -0500; I am not going to try to start an argument on the list about Prism card issues, but Karlnet tests support the following: Intersil based cards have 5db less receive sensitivity than the Agere cards. S; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00018.html (22,925 bytes)
14. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: Roger Boggs <rogerboggs@att.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 16:30:00 -0500; Wish the WiFi standard applied to the machine side of the interface, don't you? At 04:23 PM 4/3/03 -0500, you wrote: I am not going to try to start an argument on the list about Prism card issues, bu; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00019.html (9,622 bytes)
15. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Caleb Carroll" <karlnet@pathcom.ca>; Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 14:53:39 -0700; Point 1> Specifically which Prism cards? Prism 2.0 / Prism 2.5 / Prism 3.0 ? Point 2> Generally the Prism cards have LOWER receive threshold which means the exact opposite of what you are saying belo; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00020.html (25,025 bytes)
16. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 17:28:05 -0500; Caleb, Our test data shows that the "published" numbers may not be accurate on many Prism cards on the market. I do not want to start an argument about this. If you like them better, feel free to use; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00021.html (26,104 bytes)
17. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Caleb Carroll" <karlnet@pathcom.ca>; Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 15:55:32 -0700; If "support" to Karlnet means blaming other companies for the failings of Karlnet software then simply revise your list of "supported" cards and remove all references to Intersil and Prism. If you h; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00022.html (9,703 bytes)
18. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:33:07 -0500; Caleb, Simply put: If the manufacturer of the CARDS is not misleading you, then it works! Why is it that CISCO will tell you they are using the Intersil reference design, but fail to mention they cha; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00023.html (10,454 bytes)
19. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Caleb Carroll" <karlnet@pathcom.ca>; Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 10:01:08 -0700; Man, you should look into a political career. If Karlnet code only supports the Intersil reference design and none of the card manufacturers follow the reference design then what is the support for?; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00024.html (11,641 bytes)
20. RE: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1): Author: "Brian H. Oak" <oakb@infosystems1.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 11:15:36 -0700; Caleb, I never thought I would be doing this, but I have to jump to KarlNet's defense on this issue. I can see no reason to beat up on Kevin just because he is doing his best to answer your questions; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00025.html (14,720 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]