Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+different\s+wireless\s+os\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+different\s+wireless\s+os\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] different wireless os (score: 1): Author: LaRoy McCann <lmccann@roachconveyors.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:05:59 -0500; Has anyone had any experience with Mikrotik RouterOS or VNC's Star-OS? Just wondering is these might be good alterntives to karlnet. Thanks, LaRoy _______________________________________________ Karl; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00026.html (7,269 bytes)
2. Re: [Karlnet] different wireless os (score: 1): Author: "Fernando Benaiter - Micromatix" <fernando@micromatix.com.br>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:10:32 -0300; StarOS its great! Has anyone had any experience with Mikrotik RouterOS or VNC's Star-OS? Just wondering is these might be good alterntives to karlnet. Thanks, LaRoy __________________________________; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00027.html (7,437 bytes)
3. Re: [Karlnet] different wireless os (score: 1): Author: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:37:19 -0700; MT, it's great...actually, both rock. I use them both. Norm -- Original Message -- From: "Fernando Benaiter - Micromatix" <fernando@micromatix.com.br> To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.co; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00028.html (8,659 bytes)
4. Re: [Karlnet] different wireless os (score: 1): Author: LaRoy McCann <lmccann@roachconveyors.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:29:53 -0500; Thanks guys, Do either of these systems support polling? Are theses systems compatible with each other? LaRoy At 06:37 PM 10/13/2004, you wrote: MT, it's great...actually, both rock. I use them both.; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00035.html (9,986 bytes)
5. RE: [Karlnet] different wireless os (score: 1): Author: "Charles Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:42:42 -0500; Not right now Yes, in WiFI mode -Charles -- CWLab Vendor Neutral Technology Architects Maxed-out on Wimax? Come November 3, 2004 to http://www.ispcon.com/fall2004/vendorsessions.asp 773.667.4585x334; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00036.html (7,610 bytes)
6. RE: [Karlnet] different wireless os (score: 1): Author: LaRoy McCann <lmccann@roachconveyors.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:23:14 -0500; Charles, I just found this about 'nstreme protocol' in one of the manuals on Mikrotik's website. Does this not work yet? http://www.mikrotik.com/docs/ros/2.8/interface/wireless.content Benefits of ns; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00037.html (9,347 bytes)
7. Re: [Karlnet] different wireless os (score: 1): Author: "Terry Bomersbach" <terryb@the-cia.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 19:34:00 -0500; Yes and yes, and then some. _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00038.html (8,193 bytes)
8. RE: [Karlnet] different wireless os (score: 1): Author: "Charles Wu" <cwu@cwlab.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 01:32:40 -0500; Hi LaRoy, To my knowledge, I was under the impression that nstream was still in beta (supposedly "about" to be released) -Charles -- CWLab Vendor Neutral Technology Architects Maxed-out on Wimax? Com; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00039.html (10,306 bytes)
9. RE: [Karlnet] different wireless os (score: 1): Author: John Tully <tully@mikrotik.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:09:42 +0300; We are doing some testing in-house and we will be making easier ways to view the stats for clients and such. But, we have not found any changes yet. For clients that do have very low quality signal/c; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00040.html (11,887 bytes)
10. Re: [Karlnet] different wireless os (score: 1): Author: Dan Metcalf <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 08:47:08 -0400; John Tully wrote: We are doing some testing in-house and we will be making easier ways to view the stats for clients and such. But, we have not found any changes yet. For clients that do have very lo; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00041.html (9,184 bytes)
11. Re: [Karlnet] different wireless os (score: 1): Author: John Tully <tully@mikrotik.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 16:15:20 +0300; At 03:47 PM 10/15/2004, you wrote: John Tully wrote: We are doing some testing in-house and we will be making easier ways to view the stats for clients and such. But, we have not found any changes ye; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00043.html (9,974 bytes)
12. Re: [Karlnet] different wireless os (score: 1): Author: LaRoy McCann <lmccann@roachconveyors.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:53:32 -0500; John, Mikrotik doesn't have a mode where it can speak 'karlnet', does it? LaRoy. _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00044.html (8,527 bytes)
13. RE: [Karlnet] different wireless os (score: 1): Author: "Alex Phillips" <alexp@rbns.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:06:17 -0400; Hi LaRoy and Charlie Nsteame is in 2.8 http://www.mikrotik.com/docs/ros/2.8/interface/wireless.content Read it and love it. I hear that people who have been using it love it. Ask around, try it out.; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-10/msg00045.html (11,624 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]